Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tastes Like a Ho-Ho

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Damages (TV series). Spartaz ^Humbug! 13:31, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tastes Like a Ho-Ho

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An episode with no significance. In fact consists only of a short plot summary. A short summary of the plot already exists in List of Damages episodes. Magioladitis (talk) 03:01, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I have added a good source to the article which is superior to the stubby entry in the List. Colonel Warden (talk) 07:27, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- Cybercobra (talk) 08:00, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Very notable show that gets quite a lot of news coverage and stars well known actors. ChildofMidnight (talk) 16:09, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. No one is questioning the notability of the show. This AFD is for an episode of the show. Every episode isn't instantly notable for it's own article, just because it's a popular show. Wikipedia isn't a TV guide of every episode. RobJ1981 (talk) 00:49, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete & rd to the LoE per nom. No demonstrable real-world impact. The TV-review guff can, if desired, be easily accommodated there as well. This is merely a plot vehicle, for which see WP:NOT. Eusebeus (talk) 19:59, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and redirect to list of episodes. There is nothing that suggests this episode is notable by itself. A brief summary on the episode list is just fine. RobJ1981 (talk) 00:48, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As of now I have not found significant reviews of the episode that would make the episode meet the general notbality guideline; just blogs and recaps, nothing meeting WP:RS. There's the TV Guide review and I found a passing mention from The Observer that does not qualify as significnt. Martin Raybourne (talk) 23:29, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.