Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Apprentice (UK series six)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to The Apprentice (UK TV series). There are two possible outcomes here: delete or redirect. Seeing as it's likely to happen in another year, this page will be a likely search target, and can be recreated once it's confirmed. (X! · talk) · @922 · 21:07, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Apprentice (UK series six)

Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. This programme won't be airing, if at all, for another year and no infomation will come out about the programme until just before transmission. The article is based upon pure speculation and this is unlikely to change. Precedent has been that such articles are not created until a start date is announced. A simple sentence or 2 in The Apprentice (UK) will suffice until then. DJ 22:10, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for the reasons given in the nomination, with which I concur (aka "delete per nom"). Ray^Talk 00:05, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to the parent series article, although it was announced by its television channel. ApprenticeFan ^{talk contribs} 01:12, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or Redirect If it was announced that it would happen by the BBC then its worth keeping as an upcoming event rather than go through the whole kerfuffle of creating it all over again. The C of E (talk) 07:57, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: WP:CRYSTAL. When a full schedule is announced and participants known that will be time enough. As a new series may breach broadcasting guidelines before a General Election, it may not happen until late in 2010. Jezhotwells (talk) 10:00, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to The Apprentice (UK TV series) - this will become notable, and can be resurrected next year. Bazonka (talk) 12:36, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep because it is happening, the BBC have annouced it's delay, which implies it has something to delay.--aliw136 21:03, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.