Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Butterfly Garden

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 18:18, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Butterfly Garden

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability - an endorsement does not show notability, and nothing from Google searches beyond vendor listings, which makes little sense for a 2008 book. (Also see related AFD for its author, Chip St. Clair, believing that both of these are self-promotional articles). Masem (t) 00:39, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:15, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:15, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: This is pretty promotionally written, enough to where I'd support a speedy deletion as spam. There's just not anything out there that's in-depth about the book. There's the Midwest Book Review review, but that's just a few sentences long and the MBR isn't really the most reliable of sources - even prior to them coming out in 2011 and charging fees, they weren't always the strongest. I haven't fully checked for sourcing for the author for his article, but offhand I wasn't able to find a lot about him either as far as the book goes so I'm going to refrain from suggesting a redirect. Offhand both this and the author's page would need to be pretty much TNT'd to be saved even with reviews. There seems to be a very big COI here as far as the article creations go as well. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 22:23, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The strongest I found was this, but it's not really something that would be able to establish notability. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 22:32, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.