Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Klaxon.com

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Stifle (talk) 14:24, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Klaxon.com

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A non-notable blog. Refs provided are mostly primary or not-reliable. I was unable to find any non-primary sources on Google News. Likely sock or meatpuppetry as well, as the article about the related blogger Joshua Wilwohl looks exactly like this one but was written by a different account. Burpelson AFB (talk) 23:17, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Do not see any notability established from reliable sources. Truthsort (talk) 23:33, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of News-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 00:42, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:42, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Reliable sources are from the BBC [1]. It's also sourced on sites such as Steve Emerson [2] and the National Disaster Interfaiths Network [3]. The U.S. Joint Program Executive Office for Chemical and Biological Defense also sources The Klaxon.com [4] and so does Providence, Rhode Island, emergency management office [5]. This why it was added because it is notable in its field. Newsuser070 (talk) 22:16, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I do not know about the podcast from the BBC as I am unable to stream it from work, but the others do not count, I believe. Some other website simply using material posted at this website does not make it notable. The website itself must be the subject of coverage, meaning it must have had articles or books, or some such material written ABOUT it. Burpelson AFB (talk) 03:19, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Recent article done on The Klaxon.com by reputable national agency in emergency management [6]. Newsuser070 (talk) 16:19, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.