Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zambolar
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to List of Ultraman monsters. Mark Arsten (talk) 04:01, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Zambolar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Like most 'monster of the week' non-recurring villains, there isn't sufficient coverage of this character to meet WP:GNG. A merge to List of Ultraman monsters is perhaps in order, but I really don't see the point of moving a chunk of uncited plot summary from one page to another (also entirely uncited) page. Sven Manguard Wha? 05:18, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Sven Manguard Wha? 05:18, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Sven Manguard Wha? 05:19, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Sven Manguard Wha? 05:19, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as non-notable. Redirect seems pointless. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:34, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:22, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: Redirects are cheap and in this instance will lead readers to the information they seek rather than inspiring them to recreate this article. - Dravecky (talk) 14:20, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Yeah, a redirect won't hurt anything. Usually I favor trying to find a redirect, but we're talking about a character who showed up once in an old TV show. Does anyone ever search for this? Should we make redirects for every Scooby Doo villain from the 60s and 70s? What about all the various minor antagonists of Doctor Who or Star Trek? At some point, a line has to be drawn. I'm not opposed to a redirect (they are cheap), but I'm beginning to think that these hordes of Ultra Series articles simply don't belong here in any form. I'm unconvinced that anyone is ever going to search for this term, which is backed up by stats.grok.se. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 18:15, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.