Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zero db
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Michaelzeng7 (talk) 00:07, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Zero db (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:BAND. Google did not reveal any significant coverage other than http://www.clashmusic.com/feature/zero-db Walter Görlitz (talk) 20:34, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Meets both of the above guidelines via two albums on Ninja Tune, and plenty of coverage: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10].--Michig (talk) 12:25, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:59, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:59, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: Michig showed notability. SL93 (talk) 22:23, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Largely per Michig, who has shown that WP:GNG and WP:BAND are met. — sparklism hey! 15:53, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.