Jump to content

Wikipedia:Changing username/Usurpations/Completed/16

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Pizzaman79 → PizzaMan

[edit]

Pizzaman79 (talk) 12:29, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It seems the Pizzaman account is a sockpuppet for User:Booze, was used for trolling, and hasn't been used since 2007. When first registering on wikipedia, i added my birthdate to the name pizzaman, because the username pizzaman was already taken. Currently i also see the limitations of making such personal data public. I'm admittedly not wikipedia's greatest editor ever, but i try to contribute my share. As such, i would really like using the alias i've been using on many sites for over 10 years without funny suffixes.

I'm also (minimally) active on nl.wikipedia, where i use the same (SUL unified) name (Pizzaman79). The username Pizzaman is still free there. I left a notice kindly asking people not to register the name while my request pends.

I found the username exists with edits from 2007 in JAwikie and with only some talk edits and one contribution in ETwiki, both without SUL. Also, i created the german pizzaman account in an attempt to claim the SUL, which didn't work since the english pizzaman is officially the main account (it's "in migration").

I realize usurpation could be complicated and tedious, but i would really appreciate it.

Pizzaman79 (talk) 12:29, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Bureaucrat note: Everything is in order for 26 June. Kingturtle (talk) 15:15, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Great, thanks for your time and especially thanx for the request you posted to usurp immediately in case of a sockpuppet. If it's not possible, i'll just be patient :-) Question: i created a german [Pizzaman] account in an attempt to claim the SUL. I even made a few useful edits to the german wikipedia. Today i can't log into that account anymore and it says [Merged by user]. Also, in the [SUL tool], it appears i (as PizzaMan79) made no edits at all. Is this normal as part of the usurpation process? Pizzaman79 (talk) 13:22, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • User has 8 undeleted edits, 2 deleted edits, and 10 total edits. Requesting user has 231 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 23:11, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done The user "Pizzaman79" has been renamed to "PizzaMan". Kingturtle (talk) 10:38, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

PizzaManTemp → Pizzaman

[edit]

PizzaManTemp (talk) 10:10, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Doppelganger account. I'm currently usurping PizzaMan (capital M) from PizzaMan79. See my usurpation request of PizzaMan and the advice for this request by Kingturtle. The account has 0 editsin the english wiki, 5 in the ETwiki (of which one article edit) and 27 edits in the JAwiki from 2007. I don't speak these languages and have no intention on ever editing on those wikis. PizzaManTemp (talk) 10:10, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 2 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 10:10, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done The user "PizzaManTemp" has been renamed to "Pizzaman". See above. Kingturtle (talk) 10:41, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NorwegianTemp → Norwegian blue

[edit]

This is not a request for a name change. I'm sorry if this is not where my request should be posted, if it isn't please let me know who to contact. I would like to usurp the account Norwegian blue (talk · contribs) as a doppelgänger account. The account was created April 2006, and appears to have no edits. Thanks. NorwegianBlue talk 19:00, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Bureaucrat note: What username would you like to be changed to Norwegian blue? Kingturtle (talk) 19:10, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: If I'm understanding this right, he wants Norwegian blue to be renamed to something else so he can register it for himself and have it as a doppelganger. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 02:24, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Precisely. I would like to make sure that the currently unused and inactive account "Norwegian blue" isn't taken into use by whoever created it — now, two years later — creating confusion with my edits. If possible, I would like to have it registered as a doppelgänger account, that redirects to my current userpage. --12:05, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
 Bureaucrat note: NorwegianBlue, create a new account called NorwegianTemp. Then we can usurp Norwegian blue with NorwegianTemp, and you will then have control of Norwegian blue. Kingturtle (talk) 12:52, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Done: NorwegianTemp (talk · contribs). --NorwegianBlue talk 15:13, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Everything is in order for 27 June to usurp Norwegian blue with NorwegianTemp. Kingturtle (talk) 18:01, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username has an email address set.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 1 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 23:11, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done The user "NorwegianTemp" has been renamed to "Norwegian blue". Kingturtle (talk) 14:39, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hy71194 → Harry

[edit]

Hy71194 (talk) 00:10, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
He appears to only have been used to troll and vandalize articles. I wish to use that name now, as it is my real-life name, and it is a lot simpler and easier than my current. Thanks.

Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • User has 7 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 7 total edits. Requesting user has 77 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 00:10, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Done without the waiting period because the target name was blocked indefinitely. Although the name registered on bg.wiki has Patroller and Sysop status, it has not been used in over a year. Kingturtle (talk) 18:31, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Skaterthealmighty → Skater

[edit]

SKATER Speak. 04:11, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to nickname to just Skater to go ahead and match my signature, and Skater is what I'm normally adressed by. Thanks--SKATER Speak. 04:11, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Bureaucrat note: Everything is in order for 30 June. Kingturtle (talk) 19:32, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks!--SKATER Speak. 21:08, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 1472 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 23:11, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Kingturtle (talk) 18:41, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Mdcollins1984 → MDCollins

[edit]

—MDCollins (talk) 23:09, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just trying to change simplify my login to one which has been my active signature for quite a while now (was gradually trying remove the 1984 and allow people time to get used to the new name. User:Dweller was attempting to assist me, but got stuck when he noticed that User:MDCollins exists (has been registered since '06 and has made no edits). I would then like to change my SUL to MDCollins but it doesn't seem that simple, so any advice would be appreciated. Many thanks.—MDCollins (talk) 23:09, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: I placed a notice on the target username's talk page. If we don't hear anything by 30 June, we will execute the usurption. Kingturtle (talk) 23:57, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username has an email address set.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 8148 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 23:11, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Kingturtle (talk) 18:43, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Splashvirtual → Splash Virtual

[edit]

Splashvirtual (talk) 01:19, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: User "Splash Virtual" is not registered. Please see WP:CHU instead. ClueBot VI (talk) 01:21, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Kingturtle (talk) 18:44, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The-Real-ZEUS → Alexandros

[edit]

The-Real-ZEUS (talk) 17:05, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Bureaucrat note: Everything is in order for 1 July. Kingturtle (talk) 17:58, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Yes, but only for the name in en.wiki, unless the user who currently has the account comes forward and objects. Once this is completed, then you can go about doing it at other projects that are important to you. Kingturtle (talk) 18:23, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Yes, but for en.wikipedia only. Kingturtle (talk) 18:32, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 3683 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 23:11, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Is there a problem?, Do i need to do anything? XD 10:00, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
 Bureaucrat note: There's no problem. Just wait until 1 July. Kingturtle (talk) 10:39, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Kingturtle (talk) 01:04, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]


LURobby → Robby

[edit]

Please note that I am the owner of User:Robby on lb.wikipedia proof of ownership who is linked to the SUL account Robby. LURobby (talk) 22:06, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 1519 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 23:11, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Everything is in order for 1 July. Kingturtle (talk) 03:33, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Kingturtle (talk) 01:05, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

tanwer.ashish → ashishtanwer

[edit]

Ashish Tanwer 07:24, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

 Bureaucrat note: Everything is in order for 2 July. Kingturtle (talk) 10:42, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 6 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 00:28, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Kingturtle (talk) 02:55, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Pefp → Pfw

[edit]

Pefp (talk) 06:41, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 782 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 06:44, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Everything is in order for 4 July. Kingturtle (talk) 10:40, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done —Anonymous DissidentTalk 00:33, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]


D106 depot → D10

[edit]

D106 depot (talk) 06:56, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 703 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 06:59, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Everything is in order for 4 July. Kingturtle (talk) 10:40, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done —Anonymous DissidentTalk 00:35, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Behzaad2 → Behzaad

[edit]

Behzaad2 (talk) 17:25, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you.--Behzaad2 (talk) 17:25, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 7 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 17:28, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Probably I myself created this username long time ago. But now I cannot remember my password.--Behzaad2 (talk) 20:47, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Everything is in order for 4 July. Kingturtle (talk) 14:40, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done —Anonymous DissidentTalk 00:36, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]


UIN revo → Askedoffer

[edit]

UIN revo (talk) 21:42, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 769 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 21:45, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Everything is in order for 4 July. Kingturtle (talk) 14:41, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done —Anonymous DissidentTalk 00:37, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Burstmeets → Allysia

[edit]

Burstmeets (talk) 23:40, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • User has 1 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 1 total edits. Requesting user has 766 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 23:42, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Everything is in order for 4 July. Kingturtle (talk) 14:42, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done —Anonymous DissidentTalk 00:39, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fomly → Finley

[edit]

Fomly (talk) 10:10, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 1088 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 10:15, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Everything is in order for 6 July. Kingturtle (talk) 18:22, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Kingturtle (talk) 10:23, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ikit → Avy

[edit]

Ikit (talk) 10:40, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 718 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 10:44, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Everything is in order for 6 July. Kingturtle (talk) 18:33, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Kingturtle (talk) 10:25, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Punkmorten → Geschichte

[edit]

Punkmorten (talk) 18:32, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I don't want to use the name with my personal name embedded in it anymore. Punkmorten (talk) 18:32, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Bureaucrat note: Everything is in order for 6 July. Kingturtle (talk) 18:34, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 61236 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 18:38, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Kingturtle (talk) 10:30, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FingersOnRoids → Fingerz

[edit]

Fingerz 06:57, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username has Wikipedia user logs entries. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 1 deleted edits, and 1 total edits. Requesting user has 3888 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 07:01, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Everything is in order for 7 July. Kingturtle (talk) 18:46, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Kingturtle (talk) 17:34, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AllstarechoTEMP → Ase

[edit]

- ALLST✰R▼echo wuz here 18:27, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • The target username has Wikipedia user logs entries. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • User has 23 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 23 total edits. Requesting user has 39072 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 18:29, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The edits seem to be GFDL-significant (most significantly, the file upload(s)). If this request is rejected, simply boldly redirecting or using a {{distinguish}} tag may be an alternative. On the other hand, if this request is accepted, you'll need to create "AseTemp" or something so they have username to change into this one. –xenotalk 18:30, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Per File:SKPhoto.jpg, I'm thinking both users there are the same person. From what I can tell of the edits by User:Ase, they have been removal or content, re-arranging of content, wikilink words, etc.. hardly anything worthy of GFDL coverage. File:SK book cover 8.jpg is certainly a copvio if it's a book cover as such wouldn't be in the public domain.. not a recent book anyway of which this appears to be. Both images are orphaned. - ALLST✰R▼echo wuz here 18:43, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If this is true, you might contact them on their new username which seems to have edited as recently as April of this year. –xeno
Note to xeno: the last edits that I can see by user:Ase are for April 8, 2006. -T'Shael,The Vulcan Overlord 16:01, 24 June 2009 (UTC 19:09, 30 June 2009 (UTC)talk 18:46, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
You must follow the breadcrumbs a bit, Allstar wasn't entirely clear. He believes (and it seems likely enough) that User:Ase is also User:Sebastianvattamattam. –xenotalk 19:16, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, okay, that makes sense then. My apologies. -T'Shael,The Vulcan Overlord 16:01, 24 June 2009 (UTC 19:19, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Create a new username: AllstarechoTEMP, and then we can usurp Ase with AllstarechoTEMP. Kingturtle (talk) 18:49, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I've made the request for User:AllstarechoTEMP to be created. Waiting. And it's done. - ALLST✰R▼echo wuz here 19:00, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Well done. Everything is in order for 7 July. Kingturtle (talk) 19:38, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done The user "AllstarechoTEMP" has been renamed to "Ase". Kingturtle (talk) 17:39, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mailaccount → Frazier

[edit]

Mailaccount (talk) 23:52, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 855 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 23:56, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Everything is in order for 7 July. Kingturtle (talk) 01:09, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Kingturtle (talk) 17:48, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ytfin → Lane

[edit]

Ytfin (talk) 04:15, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 801 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 04:17, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Everything is in order for 9 July. Kingturtle (talk) 02:22, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Kingturtle (talk) 02:00, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Dof → Devinn

[edit]

Dof (talk) 06:17, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 1424 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 06:18, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Everything is in order for 9 July. Kingturtle (talk) 02:23, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Kingturtle (talk) 02:01, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Mmm0tive → motive

[edit]

m0tive (talk) 12:32, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 26 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 12:36, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Everything is in order for 9 July. Kingturtle (talk) 02:24, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Kingturtle (talk) 02:02, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ClickTemp → ClickBot

[edit]

ClickRick (talk) 16:21, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This is in preparation for a WP:BRFA currently being discussed at Template talk:Infobox UK place#Population - Proposal .232

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 3543 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 16:23, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Kingturtle (talk) 03:01, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

M06ff1 → M4

[edit]

M06ff1 (talk) 01:34, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 1237 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 01:36, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Everything is in order for 10 July. Kingturtle (talk) 02:25, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Kingturtle (talk) 01:37, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Selafimcash → David Thompson

[edit]

Selafimcash (talk) 04:21, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • User has 1 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 1 total edits. Requesting user has 1328 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 04:22, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Everything is in order for 10 July. Kingturtle (talk) 03:00, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Kingturtle (talk) 01:41, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Suicup → Mitsuhirato

[edit]

Suicup (talk) 14:48, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Bureaucrat note: Everything is in order for 11 July. Kingturtle (talk) 21:22, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username has an email address set.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 1720 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 21:23, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Kingturtle (talk) 03:03, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Pinstripedpublishing → jasminegreen

[edit]

Jayron32.talk.contribs 03:54, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: User "Jasminegreen" is not registered. Please see WP:CHU instead. ClueBot VI (talk) 03:59, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done by User:Dweller. Kingturtle (talk) 03:12, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Castapoesy → Memoire

[edit]

Castapoesy (talk) 03:41, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 1773 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 15:34, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Everything is in order for 12 July. Kingturtle (talk) 21:24, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done EVula // talk // ☯ // 17:30, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deon555 → Deon

[edit]

— Deon555talkI'm BACK! 15:49, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 4156 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 15:50, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Pretty sure I did, young naive ClueBot. — Deon555talkI'm BACK! 16:10, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Everything is in order for 12 July. Kingturtle (talk) 21:28, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done EVula // talk // ☯ // 17:33, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Spaceman7Spiff → SpacemanSpiff

[edit]

SpacemanSpiff (talk) 21:24, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I added the 7 in my current username because I couldn't get what I wanted, but I've just been alerted that the other user name hasn't been used in five years (and that was possibly me). -SpacemanSpiff (talk) 21:24, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • User has 2 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 2 total edits. Requesting user has 3219 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 21:27, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I meant Spaceman Spiff (talk · contribs) (with a space between the words). Sorry that I wasn't clear about that. J.delanoygabsadds 21:37, 4 July 2009 (UTC) Misunderstood what Spiff was trying to do. In any case, the page User:SpacemanSpiff edited is now a redirect, so I don't think his edits would be a problem under the GFDL. J.delanoygabsadds[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Everything is in order for 12 July. Kingturtle (talk) 21:29, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done EVula // talk // ☯ // 17:35, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

TempHcp → Hcp

[edit]

84.202.87.66 (talk) 22:20, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hei, I want to take my German Account (Hcp)global. Unfortunately it seems that this Name is allready taken. But for me it looks like that this Account did not write any articels. So can you please rename that account, so I can put the "english Hcp" to my global account. Greetings Hans-Christian

Note:
 Bureaucrat note: Please create a temporary username such as HcpTEMP as a current username to usurp the target name. Kingturtle (talk) 21:34, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Done, temporary username is "TempHcp" TempHcp (talk) 17:49, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Everything is in order for 13 July. Kingturtle (talk) 03:05, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done The user "TempHcp" has been renamed to "Hcp". Kingturtle (talk) 01:21, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Llorcs → Diora

[edit]

Llorcs (talk) 04:45, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • User has 1 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 1 total edits. Requesting user has 934 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 04:50, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Everything is in order for 13 July. Kingturtle (talk) 17:51, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Kingturtle (talk) 01:23, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Issuecheck → Sandri

[edit]

Issuecheck (talk) 05:05, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username has an email address set.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 342 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 05:05, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Everything is in order for 13 July. Kingturtle (talk) 17:52, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Kingturtle (talk) 01:25, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mbruce1 → Mbruce

[edit]

Mbruce1 (talk) 12:19, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The requested account (Mbruce) is in fact my own, but I have forgotten the password, and no longer have the email that was given at the time of registering that account.

Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • User has 3 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 3 total edits. Requesting user has 813 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 12:22, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Everything is in order for 13 July. Kingturtle (talk) 17:54, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Kingturtle (talk) 01:28, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nauseef → Jock

[edit]

Nauseef (talk) 01:28, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 642 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 01:31, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Everything is in order for 14 July. Kingturtle (talk) 23:31, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Kingturtle (talk) 03:06, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]


T'Shael → Javert

[edit]

t'shaélchat 04:29, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
"Javert" is the name that I originally wanted when I joined Wikipedia. I checked his contributions earlier today and noticed that he qualifies for usurpation. While "T'Shael" is a fine name, it is also the name of a female character in a book (I happen to be male) and this could create confusion. I didn't know about username usurpation when I made the request at WP:CHU to change my name to "T'Shael", so I would appreciate being renamed this last time. Thanks. -t'shaélchat 04:29, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • User has 2 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 2 total edits. Requesting user has 8571 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 04:32, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Everything is in order for 14 July. Kingturtle (talk) 23:32, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Kingturtle (talk) 03:09, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dyvenet → dyve

[edit]

Dyvenet (talk) 07:48, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 3 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 07:53, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Everything is in order for 14 July. Kingturtle (talk) 23:35, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Kingturtle (talk) 03:16, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Fhue → Prbeacon

[edit]

Fhue (talk) 17:44, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 373 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 17:46, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Everything is in order for 14 July. Kingturtle (talk) 23:37, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please note: As advised and in order to avoid the weeklong delay, I have submitted a newer request for name change -- WP:Changing_username request. Sorry for any inconvenience thus far. Cheers. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fhue (talk • contribs) 04:42, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Kingturtle (talk) 03:17, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Johnbull → Britannicus

[edit]

Johnbull (talk) 18:26, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • User has 8 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 8 total edits. Requesting user has 5180 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 18:26, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Everything is in order for 14 July. Kingturtle (talk) 23:38, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Kingturtle (talk) 03:18, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Imagestart → Inglis

[edit]

Imagestart (talk) 01:05, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 650 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 01:06, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Everything is in order for 15 July. Kingturtle (talk) 01:08, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done bibliomaniac15 23:27, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hru692 → Baird

[edit]

Hru692 (talk) 00:15, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 508 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 00:19, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Everything is in order for 15 July. Kingturtle (talk) 01:10, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Kingturtle (talk) 02:30, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jimmy Lavoie → Jimmy

[edit]

Jimmytalk 23:11, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 1602 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 23:13, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: Jimmy Lavoie has left a note at User talk:Jimmy. Email not set. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:49, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: I am concerned because the target name is active in fr.wiki (the home wiki) with 9500+ edits and in sco.wiki with +3000 edits. Kingturtle (talk) 22:03, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, Jimmy on fr.wikipedia is me. I recently changed my username there; it was not used on the French WP (the place I primary contribute). You may check by yourself. Sincerely, Jimmytalk 05:06, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done – looks good to me; you have the SUL claim anyway. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 16:03, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dark Horse King → Jonny

[edit]

Dark Horse King (talk) 19:39, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 657 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 19:43, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done The March 2007 request for usurpation was never replied to by the target username. Therefore, I see no reason to wait a week this time. Kingturtle (talk) 02:51, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jamierbrunton → chuckb

[edit]

Jamierbrunton (talk) 19:39, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The old user name is my real name.

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 2 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 19:41, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: Left a note at User talk:chuckb. No email adress set, so no email sent. -- Sk8er5000 (talk) 08:41, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Everything is in order for 18 July. Kingturtle (talk) 03:08, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done —Anonymous DissidentTalk 03:02, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Renaulte → ~

[edit]

E Renault Talk + 07:31, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • User has 2 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 2 total edits. Requesting user has 99 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 07:36, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
But only 2... and he hasn't been active for years.... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Renaulte (talk • contribs) 08:28, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: Just 2 edits, but unfortunately this is GFDL-able. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:47, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Everything is in order for 18 July. Kingturtle (talk) 22:05, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done —Anonymous DissidentTalk 03:02, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]


PuppyTEMP → Puppy

[edit]

KillerChihuahua?!?Advice 14:55, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]


bg: and sk: users inactive since 16 February 2008 & 26 June 2007 respectively. KC, if you're looking for this as just a sock, rather than a rename, you will need to create "PuppyTEMP" or something, so they have an account to rename into Puppy. –xenotalk 14:44, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Well, the user before was Puppy441; this account has no edits on it at all. Not sure if that's necessary. KillerChihuahua?!?Advice 14:49, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oh! You mean for my sock! Bother. The only methodology is to move the account? How the heck is the db set up, surely you can remove the flags that the account has been used? Or perhaps not, as then it would simply be open to being created. Bah. Ok, creating silly account, brb. KillerChihuahua?!?Advice 14:50, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
They rename it to "Puppy (usurped)" and rename "PuppyTEMP" to "Puppy". –xenotalk 14:51, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah I got that, see above. All "moves" are actually "renames", or vice versa, depends on how you look at it. Anyhoo, thanks, made the silly account. :P KillerChihuahua?!?Advice 15:05, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
When I requested sowhy as a doppelganger, the crats just named the old "sowhy" guy and I registered the account anew. So I'm not sure that you really need a temp account to do that but it will probably not hurt either. Regards SoWhy 16:14, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
What I was thinking, but eh, whatever. :-) KillerChihuahua?!?Advice 01:59, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 22711 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 14:45, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Everything is in order for 18 July. Kingturtle (talk) 03:15, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done —Anonymous DissidentTalk 03:03, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gwn → Ludivine

[edit]

Gwn (talk) 10:11, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username has an email address set.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 2352 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 10:15, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Everything is in order for 21 July. Kingturtle (talk) 03:21, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done —Anonymous DissidentTalk 02:52, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Wortschätzer → Wordsmith

[edit]

Wortschätzer (talk) 15:02, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

__________________________________________________________________________
_____ Explanation _____
The name I first chose at Wikipedia was the same as my address: Wordsmith,
but the account creation form reported Wordsmith as having been taken already.
It still does.
Back then, I coined a German "name" that means, roughly, "one who appreciates words": Wortschätzer
That's been my Wikipedia account name ever since.
I decided I really should have my proper English name when another editor took issue with my English
as he dropped the following line on my Talk page, once upon a time:
____________________________
A situation up with we should not put
Just checking - it's no big deal - but the correction about Holbrook Working
"which Holbrook Working was also involved with."

to

"with which Holbrook Working was also involved."
suggests to me (along with the spelling of your name) that you are not a native English speaker.
Most native English speakers find Churchill's "a situation up with we should not put" to be incredibly hilarious.
If you don't, please consider leaving this type of correction off your list.
Hope this doesn't seem too picky.

____________________________

He was right.
I am not a native English speaker.
I'm a native American speaker of English.
Kindly replace my cobbled German name with my good, old fashioned,
American name of Wordsmith that's lain fallow for far too long.
~ ~ Wortschätzer (talk) 15:02, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 392 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 15:02, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Everything is in order for 21 July. Kingturtle (talk) 03:22, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done —Anonymous DissidentTalk 02:54, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hollywoodslim → El Diablo

[edit]

Hollywoodslim (talk) 19:21, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 1 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 19:26, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: I've fixed this slightly malformed request. Also, you need to to to User_talk:El Diablo and place the following text on their page to let them know you want their username. Your 7-day waiting period will not start until you have left this note informing the user. Place the following text on the page: {{subst:usurpation requested}} ~~~~. Then click save. Cheers, — Deon555talkI'm BACK! 05:04, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: Please note that on multiple other wikis, the username "El Diablo" has a significant number of edits. If you choose this name, it may be difficult for you to obtain a unified login account in the future. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:19, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Everything is in order for July 22. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 03:10, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Kingturtle (talk) 00:59, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rcurtis5 → curtis

[edit]

Rcurtis5 (talk) 18:01, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Just looking to simplify my username.

Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • User has 7 undeleted edits, -3 deleted edits, and 4 total edits. Requesting user has 220 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 18:03, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: Questionable, but those 7 edits probably fall under GFDL. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:46, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure. None of them are to the mainspace, so their GFDL significance is questionable. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 01:24, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I for one don't think the edits are GFDL-significant, since they seem to be mostly tests. –Juliancolton | Talk 02:39, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
OK, then. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:44, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Everything is in order for 23 July. Kingturtle (talk) 02:45, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Kingturtle (talk) 17:55, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Sevault12345 → Rye

[edit]

Sevault12345 (talk) 14:56, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 2 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 15:00, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Everything is in order for 23 July. Kingturtle (talk) 02:48, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Kingturtle (talk) 17:56, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew Nº → Andrew1

[edit]

Andrew | flame him | stalk him 18:37, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 64 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 18:39, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: Andrew1 has 21 edits on Commons; the most recent was on 21 April 2009. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:11, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Andrew Nº, SUL will be difficult. Are you sure you want this name? Care to pick another? Kingturtle (talk) 12:18, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Everything is in order for 25 July. Kingturtle (talk) 19:21, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Kingturtle (talk) 02:39, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Carmouche → Ferrie

[edit]

Carmouche (talk) 11:05, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 2215 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 11:09, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Everything is in order for 26 July. Kingturtle (talk) 12:18, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Kingturtle (talk) 02:40, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Petramis → Testu

[edit]

Petramis (talk) 15:10, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username has an email address set.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 608 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 15:11, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Everything is in order for 26 July. Kingturtle (talk) 12:19, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Kingturtle (talk) 02:41, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Teahot → Ash

[edit]
  • Current username: Teahot (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
  • Target username: Ash (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
  • Datestamp: 07:29, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
  • For bureaucrat use: SUL report (old • new) | Email target username   (1)  (2)
  • I would like to move to using my actual normal nickname as this particular account has remained unused but reserved for some years. I moved to an completely anonymous account name after being spooked by some wp:outing actions by another user, but would prefer a long term name for my account using my more natural nickname.

Teahot (talk) 07:29, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 6614 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 07:31, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: SUL would be time consuming and possibly difficult for this target name. Are you sure you want it? Kingturtle (talk) 12:21, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • As the vast majority of my edits are only on Wikipedia (and a few on Commons), I would be content if only this account history were to be transferred. I would also be happy if the new account were only on Wikipedia rather than a SUL as I could continue with a different account on Commons for the rare occasions I use it, if this is of any help?—Teahot (talk) 16:18, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Everything is in order for 27 July. Kingturtle (talk) 19:22, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Kingturtle (talk) 02:43, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ha! → Brumski

[edit]

Ha! (talk) 11:24, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 2162 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 11:27, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Everything is in order for 27 July. Kingturtle (talk) 12:22, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Kingturtle (talk) 02:45, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Stjimmy61892 → Saint Jimmy

[edit]

Stjimmy61892 (talk) 01:28, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

friend suggests it looks better, i agree.

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 142 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 01:31, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Wikipedia editing is not a profession. Kingturtle (talk) 02:47, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: He changed his reason from "looks more professional" to "looks better." King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:44, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Kingturtle (talk) 03:46, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Flash176 → Ridge Runner

[edit]

Flash176 (talk) 04:16, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Picked my current name when I didn't expect to make many edits on Wikipedia.

Note:

Umm, yes, I did leave a message for that user.--Flash176 (talk) 04:27, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, going by the time stamp, I guess the bot looked before I had placed the notice.--Flash176 (talk) 04:28, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Everything is in order for 28 July. Kingturtle (talk) 01:01, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Kingturtle (talk) 03:48, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jenuk1985 → Jeni

[edit]

Jeni (talk)(Jenuk1985) 23:08, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I am Jeni on the other wikis that I use and would like to bring this account into line with this. I have Jeni on: commons (329 edits), en.wikinews (14), cy.wikipedia (3), en.wikiquote (4), and mediawiki (0). Jeni (talk)(Jenuk1985) 23:08, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 8761 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 23:10, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: User Jenuk1985 has been migrated to the unified login system. Renaming it will cause the local user to be detached from the global one. Will that be okay with you? Kingturtle (talk) 02:48, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yep, thats completely fine. Jeni (talk)(Jenuk1985) 11:37, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done The target name was notified last March. Kingturtle (talk) 03:53, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Alexcorps → Brocklee

[edit]

—Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexcorps (talk • contribs) 18:04, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Bureaucrat note: Everything is in order for 30 July. Kingturtle (talk) 01:47, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 16 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 01:45, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Kingturtle (talk) 03:00, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CCruise → Chriq

[edit]

CCruise (talk) 06:03, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username has an email address set.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 921 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 06:03, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Everything is in order for 1 August. Kingturtle (talk) 02:46, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Kingturtle (talk) 20:48, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Braghis → Pinkadelian

[edit]

Braghis (talk) 21:24, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 449 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 21:24, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Everything is in order for 2 August. Kingturtle (talk) 02:47, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Kingturtle (talk) 23:43, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ShifterBr → Nickin

[edit]

–Nickin/ShifterBr (talk) 20:52, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Reason: I accidentally created a "User:Nickin" page some time ago when I thought that a username change wasn't possible. So, I want to change my username to Nickin, if possible.
Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • User has 1 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 1 total edits. Requesting user has 518 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 20:54, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: The one edit was a simple addition of "the zip code is no longer #####". That is probably all right to override at this point, but it would be a good idea to hear what a crat says. (X! · talk)  · @184  ·  03:24, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
ShifterBr owns "Nickin", so that's probably irrelevant. –Juliancolton | Talk 03:25, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm... there seems to be disagreement about this request. Shifter, do you own the Nickin account, or did you just create the page? (X! · talk)  · @189  ·  03:31, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

After reading Nickin's talk page, Shifter's made it clear that he owns both accounts. Crats, this could probably be a speedy close. (X! · talk)  · @191  ·  03:34, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Bureaucrat note: Shifter, log in as Nickin and make an edit in this thread. That will hurry this along. Kingturtle (talk) 01:06, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I didn't explain it well. I created Nickin (I moved ShifterBr to Nickin) trying to rename myself, as I didn't know that username change was allowed. That's it. –Nickin/ShifterBr (talk) 20:54, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Shifter, are you able to log in as Nickin? If so, do so, and make an edit here. Kingturtle (talk) 03:50, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, I can't. –Nickin/ShifterBr (talk) 04:40, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Bureaucrat note: No problem. But I would like to take this through the normal procedures, then. Everything is in order for 5 August. Kingturtle (talk) 04:45, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Kingturtle (talk) 03:56, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Jlf2 → Jlf

[edit]

Jlf2 (talk) 03:15, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 7 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 03:18, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Everything is in order for 5 August. Kingturtle (talk) 03:55, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Kingturtle (talk) 03:57, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Faey ania → Faey

[edit]

Faey ania (talk) 09:31, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • User has 1 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 1 total edits. Requesting user has 2 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 09:34, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Everything is in order for 5 August. Kingturtle (talk) 01:36, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Kingturtle (talk) 03:58, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nuka Lives → Tymime

[edit]

Nuka Lives (talk) 18:43, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I don't remember ever making an account with my usual internet name, but it appears that I did. I must have thought "Nuka Lives" was better at the time.

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username has an email address set.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 277 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 18:47, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Everything is in order for 7 August. Kingturtle (talk) 18:52, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done EVula // talk // ☯ // 13:36, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Азгар → Azgar

[edit]

Азгар (talk) 03:39, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I'm Azgar in other wikiprojects (1-st of all in ru.wiki). Азгар is just cyrillic version of Azgar. --Азгар (talk) 03:39, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 11 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 03:40, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Everything is in order for 7 August. Kingturtle (talk) 20:51, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Kingturtle (talk) 17:50, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Firestorm → The Wordsmith

[edit]

Firestorm Talk 01:37, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm, forgot to leave a rationale. Anyway, I've been using Firestorm on the internet since I was 14, and I feel it no longer represents me accurately.

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username has an email address set.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 3634 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 01:42, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Everything is in order for 11 August. Kingturtle (talk) 02:15, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Kingturtle (talk) 11:01, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Zztp → Lauren

[edit]

Zztp (talk) 03:07, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 1220 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 03:07, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Everything is in order for 10 August. Kingturtle (talk) 03:59, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Kingturtle (talk) 11:02, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FoxBot2 → FoxBot

[edit]

FoxBot2 (talk) 14:14, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I have a unified login for FoxBot except for the english wikipdia.

Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • User has 4 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 4 total edits. Requesting user has 2 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 14:17, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: Your username may violate our username policy; the word "bot" implies that your account is a bot. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:13, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It is a bot as you can see on FoxBot, I want to apply for a bot flag on the English wikipedia. - Foxie001 (talk) 06:56, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Everything is in order for 12 August. Kingturtle (talk) 17:51, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done (this is actually a WP:CHU/SUL request). WJBscribe (talk) 19:15, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ravit1234 → Ravit

[edit]

Ravit1234 (talk) 12:19, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 6 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 12:19, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Everything is in order for 14 August. Kingturtle (talk) 17:57, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. WJBscribe (talk) 22:33, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you!! :-) Ravit (talk) 21:43, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Teosss → Teocrito

[edit]

Teosss (talk) 13:09, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 1 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 13:10, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Everything is in order for 15 August. Kingturtle (talk) 17:58, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. WJBscribe (talk) 22:36, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vpjayant → Vivan

[edit]

-vpjayant (talk) 13:25, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I wish to contribute more on Wikipedia, and Vivan is my actual first name. It would make life easier if I used this as I am moving over from my current username to Vivan on other sites. The user appears to have not done anything on Wikipedia. There is also a chance that I made the account Vivan a while ago but forgot password/ didn't put an e-mail address. -vpjayant (talk) 13:25, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 16 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 13:30, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Everything is in order for 14 August. Kingturtle (talk) 17:58, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Kingturtle (talk) 01:15, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Mgmvegas → Richard

[edit]

Mgmvegas (talk) 23:51, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There is nothing more that i would enjoy than to have my username be my first name. Mgmvegas (talk) 23:51, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 158 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 23:52, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Everything is in order for 14 August. Kingturtle (talk) 18:02, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Kingturtle (talk) 01:17, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Michaelskeldon2009 → qwertyfire

[edit]

Michaelskeldon2009 (talk) 17:23, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 1 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 17:26, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Everything is in order for 15 August. Kingturtle (talk) 18:04, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done —Anonymous DissidentTalk 01:39, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Weasel, the Geek → florinanghel

[edit]

Weasel, the Geek (talk) 22:38, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: User "Florinanghel" is not registered. Please see WP:CHU instead. ClueBot VI (talk) 22:42, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done by Bibliomaniac15. →javért chat 23:07, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Summ123 → Summ

[edit]

Summ123 (talk) 13:31, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
My existing accounts on de:wiki and commons have the same name.

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 1 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 13:33, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: Notified. (X! · talk)  · @673  ·  15:09, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. WJBscribe (talk) 22:35, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]


e-kemal → kemal

[edit]

E-kemal (talk) 21:21, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 1 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 21:22, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. WJBscribe (talk) 22:37, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dtbohrer → Niagara

[edit]

​​​​D.B.talk•contribs 03:09, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia that are now deleted. Usernames with only deleted edits can usually be usurped.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 6 deleted edits, and 6 total edits. Requesting user has 10156 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 03:12, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done —Anonymous DissidentTalk 13:52, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Allets → Igelkott

[edit]
  • Current username: Allets (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
  • Target username: Igelkott (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
  • Datestamp: 23:27, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
  • For bureaucrat use: SUL report (old • new) | Email target username   (1)  (2)
  • Reason: My current name is an easy anagram of my real name, and i see now that using one's real name is not recommended. On the contrary, igelkott means hedhegog in Swedish, which is one of my favourite animals and also resembles my haircut!--Igelkott 23:08, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
Note:
 Bureaucrat note: Are you User:Igelkott on the Swedish wikipedia? WJBscribe (talk) 22:42, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

SJL → 01011000

[edit]

– SJL 07:01, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to change my account name to improve my privacy. The account currently named "01011000" made two edits three years ago, both of which were vandalism.

Note:
 Done —Anonymous DissidentTalk 05:57, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Shady Leprechaun → A little insignificant

[edit]

Shady Leprechaun (talk) 00:53, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • This user was created less than 6 months ago, such usernames may not be usurped. You can file another request when the username is older than 6 months.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 1746 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 00:58, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I changed my username a few days ago, and a friend requested that I change it back. Thus the reason for the time of creation and edits. See this edit verifying the change. "A little insignificant" is my old username. So can the action be performed? Shady Leprechaun (talk) 01:21, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I would appreciate some feedback on this. I don't want to be stuck with the wrong username for six months. Shady Leprechaun (talk) 01:13, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done —Anonymous DissidentTalk 04:30, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Microcell2009 → Microcell

[edit]

Microcell2009 (talk) 14:41, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Please rename my account into User:Microcell. Current Microcell registered almost 2 years ago and hasn't made any edits since 2007. So, that account can be usurpated, you may rename it into something like User:Microcell-old. Thanks, --Microcell2009 (talk) 14:41, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username has an email address set.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 2 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 14:43, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
So what about renaming? One week kind of passed, the target user hasn't answered. Is it sufficient? --Microcell2009 (talk) 08:24, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done —Anonymous DissidentTalk 12:54, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks!--Microcell2009 (talk) 16:37, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Cocu66 → Cocu

[edit]

Cocu66 (talk) 19:04, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I want to usurp local user User:Cocu so I can get my no:Bruker:Cocu account globalized (I also have the german de:User:Cocu, and 55 other projects). I've added a subst:SUL-msg tag to User:Cocu's talk page. As far as I can see, the local user have made no contributions. Cocu66 (talk) 19:04, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username has an email address set.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 2 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 19:07, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. This request should have been moved to WP:CHU/SUL. WJBscribe (talk) 22:03, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Little Lewis → Lewis

[edit]

Little Lewis (talk) 22:17, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
According to this tool the account has been inactive on the projects where it's registered, in most cases for two years or longer. It never seems to have been used at all on this site (en.wikipedia.org) which is where I'd like to use it. Thanks! --Little Lewis (talk) 22:17, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 4 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 22:19, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Account that has made edits (100 or so) on English Wikiversity has been inactive for about 30 months. Bot is wrong; requester has made over 4 edits and is editing actively. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 08:18, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Visualbasic2008 → Labradodlenz

[edit]

Visualbasic2008 (talk) 05:08, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 1 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 05:12, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Delinodeshields → Hykos1045

[edit]


Sheogorath 3h*kwnN81 → Sheogorath

[edit]

Sheogorath 3h*kwnN81 (talk) 18:54, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 36 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 18:55, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]


soundvision,inc —Preceding unsigned comment added by Soundvision,inc (talk • contribs) 21:22, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Ravensfire2002 → Ravensfire

[edit]

Ravensfire2002 (talk) 23:24, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Advancing Quality → JBou

[edit]

Advancing Quality (talk) 09:25, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I wanted to add an article about quality improvement in the NHS- specifically a programme called Advancing Quality. My name is not Advacning Quality and so I want to change it to a nickname so i can edit on wikipedia


Galeforce1996 → Calvary

[edit]

—Preceding unsigned comment added by Galeforce1996 (talk • contribs) 22:20, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Fixed malformed request. (X! · talk)  · @184  ·  03:24, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: No note left or email sent to target user, please do so. MBisanz talk 01:33, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]


GateKeeperX → GateKeeper

[edit]

GateKeeper(X) @ 00:35, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This is the username I originally wanted when I signed up for Wikipedia 1+ year ago. It has 2 edits and has been inactive since July 2006. -- GateKeeper(X) @ 00:39, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Wiklopedia → Clarke99

[edit]


Kaveri47 → Manali D

[edit]

Kaveri47 (talk) 01:54, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I tried to create an account with this name, but it is too similar to the account User:ManaliD --Kaveri47 (talk) 01:54, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]


pierregh → kboye

[edit]

Pierregh (talk) 19:56, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Tilla2501 → Tilla

[edit]

Tilla2501 (talk) 20:23, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Ilya K → Ilya

[edit]

Ilya K (talk) 12:02, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Adamfancey → Adam Fancey

[edit]

Adamfancey (talk) 18:32, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Goph'r → Gopher or Gopher Baroque

[edit]

Goph'r (talk) 16:56, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Quite some time ago, I successfully created account, Gopher. I logged in a few times without problem. Then it stopped working. I tried the Recover Password tool, but never got a message. It got to be too much work struggling though the Wiki admin pages just to be able to log in to make a small technical update to a single WikePage, so I let it go. So today I have a little more energy to try yet again. I finally found an alternate name that is considered not too similar to my customary, "Gopher" or "Gopher Baroque" so I have a new account to lauch this request from.

Would you please advise if you can connect me back up to one of my preferred IDs, Gopher or Gopher Baroque. You might also confirm whether it is appropriate to condense these down to one account, since I see neither seem to have make any contributions.

I'm not trying to take over someone else's account, just clean up my work. If there is some confusion, the email address should be Gopher@P*********.com. Thanks for the "inside" assistance!

cheers, GB

 Bureaucrat note: A Portuguese person owns the rights to Gopher, so I'm not sure if we should simply set you to Gopher Baroque. MBisanz talk 22:05, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done As Gopher Baroque per SUL issues elsewhere. MBisanz talk 06:15, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Glfreedman → GORDON FREEDMAN

[edit]

Glfreedman (talk) 03:08, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Taylor-Drew → Amy Gershfield

[edit]

—Anonymous DissidentTalk 08:39, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed template for user (had forgotten the final '}' of the template subst'ing). —Anonymous DissidentTalk 08:40, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: User "Amy Gershfield" is not registered. Please see WP:CHU instead. ClueBot VI (talk) 08:45, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

siddhart_srivastava → siddharth_srivastava

[edit]

Siddhart srivastava (talk) 15:06, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: User "Siddharth_srivastava" is not registered. Please see WP:CHU instead. ClueBot VI (talk) 15:06, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

eszet → ß

[edit]

Eszet (talk) 06:19, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • User has 4 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 4 total edits. Requesting user has 5 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 08:45, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RJaskola → WikiKid

[edit]

Javért  |  Talk 03:48, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Done —Anonymous DissidentTalk 08:24, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dark Lord of the Sith1 → Dark Lord of the Sith

[edit]

Dark Lord of the Sith1 (talk) 01:17, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Bureaucrat note: Approved for the 13th. MBisanz talk 06:16, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 460 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 08:45, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
{{Done}} —Anonymous DissidentTalk 00:34, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I've just realised MBisanz approved this a day early, back with the date header mess. I've undone the rename; this can be redone tomorrow. Not a big deal – only three pages were moved. We must allow the full time for a user to respond. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 00:41, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done —Anonymous DissidentTalk 06:29, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Temporaily → Yong

[edit]

Temporaily (talk) 00:30, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 2 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 00:32, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done —Anonymous DissidentTalk 14:07, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bozhi → Poshi

[edit]

Bozhi (talk) 03:12, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 8 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 03:13, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done —Anonymous DissidentTalk 14:17, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Changing_username/Usurpations/Completed/16&oldid=1146803947"