Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Georgia Bulldogs head football coaches/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by The Rambling Man 10:57, 16 May 2012 [1].
List of Georgia Bulldogs head football coaches (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured list because it incorporates all of the comments from the six previously FL promoted SEC coaches' lists (Alabama, Auburn, Tennessee, Arkansas, LSU and Vanderbilt). Hopefully this will get through with minimal issues, but as always am grateful for any comments to make this list even better. Thanks again to all who take the time to look at this! Patriarca12 (talk) 16:13, 25 March 2012 (UTC) :Nominator(s): Patriarca12 (talk) 16:13, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
CommentSupport –"Four of those coaches also won conference championships". The first coach mentioned after this is Herman Stegeman, who didn't lead a team to a bowl game. This means the sentence is inaccurate.Giants2008 (Talk) 22:31, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]- Good catch. Reworded to make better sense. Thanks for taking a look at this! Patriarca12 (talk) 23:59, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 16:20, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
|
Resolved comments from NapHit (talk) 19:11, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
'Comments
NapHit (talk) 16:11, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Support NapHit (talk) 19:11, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Image review: No complaints. Goodraise 14:00, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Goodraise 17:32, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Some comments from the football ignorant Goodraise
Might be back with more. Goodraise 15:14, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Please look over the references to find any more errors like these. Goodraise 19:25, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
My apologies for these piecemeal comments. I'm investing a lot more time into this, than it might appear. Goodraise 04:42, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Some more. Goodraise 16:08, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
That should be it from me. Well, a few more pictures might be nice, but that's no must. Goodraise 02:16, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
|
- One last thing, could you add page numbers for reference #9? Once that is done, I'm glad to support this nomination. Good work.Goodraise 17:32, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Done. Thanks for the support! Patriarca12 (talk) 18:43, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Support A nice article overall. Although I am supporting the article, could you link to our article on Winning percentage in the lead? I know you already do in the Key, but given the fact that "winning percentage" is a misnomer, I think for laypersons a link would be best in both places. Also, the table is a little wide in my opinion, and will require a horizontal scroll bar on some screens, but again this isn't enough for me to withhold support. Well done. Harrias talk 19:47, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Linked and thanks for the support! Patriarca12 (talk) 10:49, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.