Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Minecraft (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Userfy. The (now properly attributed) draft will be moved to User:qwv/Minecraft. Additionally, I will increase Draft:Minecraft to full protection. RL0919 (talk) 17:51, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Minecraft

This is largely identical to the mainspace Minecraft article. Any changes could easily be made to the article directly or proposed on its talk page. There's nothing significant to justify an entirely seperate draft page. Zerbu ^Talk 18:42, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Per nom. If draft creator wanted to workshop complicated or potentially controversial edits to certain parts of the existing article, they may use their sandbox. silvia (BlankpopsiclesilviaASHs4) (inquire within) 19:09, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to creator's userspace as creator has said they have no objection to this solution. silvia (BlankpopsiclesilviaASHs4) (inquire within) 06:24, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and BlankpopsiclesilviaASHs4. — Sundostund mppria ^{(talk / contribs)} 20:27, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete duplicate article. Partofthemachine (talk) 21:30, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I am fine if its deleted and moved to my user sandbox Qwv (talk) 22:21, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Move it to userspace – per BlankpopsiclesilviaASHs4. DecafPotato (talk) 01:58, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete copy & paste move of Minecraft. 174.27.21.219 (talk) 21:04, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Userfy. The page certainly does not need to be deleted, but this type of draft whereby an existing article is copied (attribution needed; it has been provided) and then worked on separately (which is fine) is usually kept in userspace. —Alalch E. 09:50, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Minecraft, with the option to Userfy. Why do otherwise reasonable editors think that a draft should be deleted when there is an article? In such cases, redirection may be in order, whether speedy or regular. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:06, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I should note that this was at RFD and was both deleted and salted. Pizzaplayer219^Talk_Contribs 13:54, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and salt harder Normally this would be a WP:SRE case, but in this case the people in charge of redirects have decided there shouldn't be a redirect. The same logic behind WP:SRE says there shouldn't be a non-redirect page, so the only option left is deletion. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:29, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.