Jump to content

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 May 13

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

May 13

[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on May 13, 2016.

Chemicalizations

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 17:09, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And if this makes any sense I'm a Dutchman. Declined at CSD Si Trew (talk) 23:33, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - Both "Chemicalization" and "Chemicalizations" appear to be theological jargon terms used within the Christian Science pseudo-cult, a historical oddity that's still hanging in there in some forms. See here for one, which as a bit of pretentious nonsense is almost charming in its raw, unashamed nature:
    • If faith in the truth of being, which you impart mentally while destroying error, causes chemicalization (as when an alkali is destroying an acid), it is because the truth of being must transform the error to the end of producing a higher manifestation. This fermentation should not aggravate the disease, but should be as painless to man as to a fluid, since matter has no sensation and mortal mind only feels and sees materially.
  • I'm reminded of the old saw about how breathing involves bodies losing well needed phlogiston. Thus, while the current redirect is incorrect, there perhaps is some kind of future basis for an independent article in there. Which, as we know, is all the more reason to delete what we have now: red text encourages future article creation. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 05:17, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

NBMB

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 16:56, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently, this acronym means "No Boss Mini Boss". This term does not seem exclusive to the target of this redirect. Steel1943 (talk) 23:32, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Chemistries

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. JohnCD (talk) 16:57, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I dont think you can pluralise it in this way can you? Si Trew (talk) 23:09, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep, yes, you can. It's used in several articles, although not at the main one. I could see an argument for pointing it at the dab, but I don't think it's a big deal either way. -- Tavix (talk) 01:43, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. It sounds wrong to me, but as a practicing chemist, I have heard it used. -- Ed (Edgar181) 11:39, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment A quick search on the Internet shows stuff like "blood chemistries", "battery chemistries", and "surface chemistries". But the question is whether there would be a need to link chemistry or chemistries by itself as that word is fairly common. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 08:06, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn by nominator User:SimonTrew as speedy keep with consensus. I worked in the molecular modeling industry for many years and I don't think I ever heard it used there but it probably was and just sailed past my ears as making sense. Not logged in because I am backing off from the discussion about me at WP:ANI and don't want to be WP:INVOLVED but the ones I listed that are pretty obvious keeps like this one then I have no problem speedily keeping them. Si 84.3.187.196 (talk) 07:15, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Empress of Pop

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 16:59, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wouldn't this be Madonna (entertainer)? I dunno on this one. (Neelix redirect) it is not a back formation from the Japanese but I am not sure where we could put it in EN:WP. Si Trew (talk) 22:45, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete This was the title of a single article in Time magazine in Asia. [1] It does not carry over to multiple articles or became a major moniker for her. On the other hand, "Empress of J-Pop" has more articles, although a lot of those are blogs and unreliable sources. That version of the nickname has been mentioned in books such as Lonely Planet. [2] AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 08:00, 15 May 2016 (UTC) updated 16:06, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - While I want to note that the distinct title of "Empress of J-Pop" is its own thing, and I could see that as maybe being justified from reliable sources. However, that's another debate, another time. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 09:03, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The coldest place

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Coldest place. JohnCD (talk) 17:14, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(neelix redirect) This is a bit of a queer one. The coldest place on Earth I think is near the south pole but I am no meteorologist I don't even remember to take me titfer when it is raining. It probably could be redirected somewhere but not to Absolute Zero i.e. -275.16 deg celcius if my 1974 handbook of facts and figures is anything to go by but this is a bit queer but don't know where we could put it. I think actually the coldest place is in the east of Russia it gets a bit sharpish there in the winter but I am not sure it makes much sense. Si Trew (talk) 22:42, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Snowball (appropriately!) retarget. The thing is with these Neelix redirects they sometimes kinda "block" people trying (like me) trying to find that kind of information. WP:BLEEDINGOBVIOUS. By the way I picked up a copy of the 1971 Children's Wonderful World Encylopaedia the other day which has beautiful illustrations but all in old pounds shillings and sense because it was published just before decimalisation day by Hamlyn, for some reason old books the British are turfing out tend to end up in cheap shops in Hungary I guess because they have been sitting on the shelves too long in British charity shops so just get shipped by the 1 yard (0.91 m). It is really beautiful but a bit odd being published in 1971 it makes no mention of the moon landings which even in a children's encylopaedia you would think they would have whacked in a bit but then of course it would probably have to be completely reset in type just to fit in a picture or something by a typesetter which of course those people hardly exist no, except for Mr. SHRDLU of course who I believe is doing well. User:SimonTrew editing as IP for technical reasons. 84.3.187.196 (talk) 07:21, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Space pirates (antagonists)

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 17:07, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This redirect is probably ambiguous, considering that List of space pirates exists and probably more than one character there is an antagonist in its related story. However, the disambiguator in this redirect is so odd that I'm not sure if the redirect should be deleted or retargeted, but it certainly cannot be kept. Steel1943 (talk) 22:30, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Metroid-style game

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Metroidvania. JohnCD (talk) 17:11, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Should this actually target Metroidvania? Steel1943 (talk) 22:18, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Meroid

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 17:06, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is an ambiguous misspelling since Meteoroid exists. Steel1943 (talk) 22:16, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Meroid editors like me think this should be Deleted to help the search engine do its business. Your hummble servant Si Trew (talk) 22:48, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The thing with brand drug names is they are not really very WP:WORLDWIDE. They tend because of different regulation authorities' use of names either become genericized trademarks like Aspirin which is of course the last thing that a drug company having invested millions or billions in a drug or they have to fight very hard to protect their trademark after doing years of research and usually having to reap their rewards in about seven years before it becomes a generic drug (the drug itself not the name). So if it's known by that name fine but in my part of the world I have never heard it called by that name, and I imagine that would be the same for others with things like Panadol or I dunno Beecham's Powder or Lemsip or Frador or Anadin (taking Occam's Razor I think I need not multply examples). The fact they also may be for common cure kinda bathroom cabinet stuff also just be paracetemol and aspirin and caffeine and sometimes codeine (but not in the United States of course) means the inverse also that the same name can be formulated in different ways for different markets. So I am not sure whether Wikipedia should pretend to be a Pharmacopoeia when it doesn't really know. People who want to look up what is in a drug have many other ways to do so and in most European markets there is a big label in the packet that says what it is how it works and so on, I am not sure Wikipedia should attempt to replace a medical doctor's advice. Or am I being too cautious? Si Trew (talk) 08:03, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - This appears to be a common typo for Metroid, a real name associated with multiple individuals, a specific title for Metronidazole, and likely multiple other things. None of them stand out to an extent that I think a disambiguation page is needed. Really, I would just flush this redirect. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 09:24, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Band limiter

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. JohnCD (talk) 17:04, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmkm this is maybe OK (neelix redirect) but just pushing it a bit with the space in it a high or low bandpass filter is fine this one is just kinda on the edge of OK. Might be OK because the target explains it but t he rediricet is pushing it Si Trew (talk) 21:58, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep - For people without any background in electronics, physics, and so on, it makes sense to search about real-world products described as a "band limiter"/"band-limiter", and the natural thing seems to be to direct them to the technical-type page about frequency limitation. I don't see a problem here. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 06:24, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedily withdrawn by nominator (as Keep) fine by me. I toss the coin and others make the call. This just seemed on the edge of reasonable because of the space in it. Si Trew (talk) 07:57, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Universe of the Metroid series

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was selectively keep the items that are specifically proposed to be kept below. This should include Universe of the Metroid series and all proper names that are discussed in the target article. Delete the rest. If I've deleted anything that's actually discussed in the target, tell me to restore it. Deryck C. 16:16, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Most, if not all, of the redirects in this nomination (except for the first one) are locations or settings in the Metroid video game universe. Most of them targeted Universe of the Metroid series before the version it target was deleted as a result of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Universe of the Metroid series. In the target article's current state, it doesn't seem to identify the subjects of these redirects well enough to warrant redirection to the basic series article. So, delete per the precedence set by the aforementioned WP:AFD discussion as well as per WP:NOTWIKIA. Steel1943 (talk) 21:57, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Thus comment probably refers to Nocturnal Sector. This comment was moved here after all of the entries were merged together. Steel1943 (talk) 22:08, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Does indeed Steely and I are both going through em and never technically had a {{ec}} to my surpise but my comment makes little sense now they are merged. Si Trew (talk) 22:51, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Super Mario Buildings & Places

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 May 26#Super Mario Buildings & Places

Storyline of the Mario series

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 17:02, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Mario video game series doesn't really have a storyline, nor is one mentioned at the target article. The gaming series is a batch of non-linear video games which do not have a storyline related to any other titles in the series, just the same characters and concepts. Steel1943 (talk) 21:10, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. No point in directing the reader to an article section that isn't there. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:05, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Mario day

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 17:49, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This redirect was an article that was redirected to Mario as a result of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mario day. However, the word "day" isn't even mentioned anywhere in Mario. At this point, delete per WP:NOTWIKIA. Steel1943 (talk) 20:58, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Not a regular event. No person named day mentioned in article. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 15:54, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Mario (old)

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Page history has been relocated. Deryck C. 22:30, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect with an unclear disambiguator that doesn't seem to need its edit history retained per WP:CWW. Steel1943 (talk) 20:53, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(Struck out part of statement that is no longer true now that the edit history has been moved elsewhere.) Steel1943 (talk) 18:17, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete (old) is not a disambiguator. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 15:55, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Wikipedia:AN/K

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 May 26#Wikipedia:AN/K

NES Super Mario World

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 16:00, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The subject of these redirects was never released on the NES, nor was there a video game released on the NES titled "Super Mario World". Delete both as unhelpfully erroneous with no valid retargeting options. Steel1943 (talk) 18:26, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Well it makes no sense in Latin or Italian. It really makes no sense at all. carpe diem and today's a new day just about on my time UTC+2 Si Trew (talk) 22:03, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Shoy: IMO, no, since the Super Mario series has a clear distinction between using the word "Bros." versus "World" in its titles. In other words, redirecting a "World" title to a "Bros." title could be seen as a unhelpful, misleading ambiguous option. Steel1943 (talk) 13:45, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 15:57, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The subject of the redirect's target is not a "character gallery". Steel1943 (talk) 18:23, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Super Mario World (Famicom homebrew)

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 15:56, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Per the edit history of this redirect, this redirect was previously an article about a pirated version of the redirect's target article's subject. Information regarding the subject of the redirect seems absent from the target article. So, delete per WP:NOTWIKIA. Steel1943 (talk) 18:22, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Mario Clone

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 15:56, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Minor enemy character in the redirect's target's subject not mentioned in the target article. Delete per WP:NOTWIKIA. Steel1943 (talk) 18:11, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Viro plasm

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Withdrawn/Retarget to Viroplasm. It's clearly a valid alternative spelling. Steel1943 (talk) 17:21, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This redirect is the name of an attack used by some enemies in the redirect's target subject. The redirect is not mentioned in the target article. Delete per WP:NOTWIKIA. Steel1943 (talk) 18:01, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

You will remove these restraints and leave this cell with the door open

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was blown up along with the rest of Starkiller Base. --BDD (talk) 15:55, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, WP:NOTQUOTE. This is a fairly minor quote from the film, minor enough for it not to be mentioned in the article. -- Tavix (talk) 16:11, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Dia duit

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 15:54, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:RFOREIGN. Per the original revision: "Dia duit is hello in Irish." -- Tavix (talk) 16:01, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Holowynge

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 15:54, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Back when this redirect was created, there was a mention of this word in the following context: "the earliest record of 'hollo', from which the word 'hello' derivates, is found in Andrew Boorde's 1542 book "A compendious regyment or a dyetary of helth". In the book, it is presented as 'holowynge'." It has since been removed, I assume from a lack of sourcing, and I too was unable to find evidence of holowynge being used as hello. -- Tavix (talk) 15:59, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I try to add some context. When the telephone was invented by that chap A G Bell the first recorded example of "hollo" or "hallo" was because his Hungarian assistant shouted down the phone to him from the second telephone "Hallom" which is kinda Hungarian for "I hear you". I diunno if that helps or hinders here but I think we need to make a distinction of hello/hello/hallo and hollo. I cann perfectly see why in Old English it would be holowynge that is just essentially in modern English hallowing or well pretty much next to hallowing but this one is a bit absurd really I think. I just try to stick in some stuff so other editors can make a judgment call better. Si Trew (talk) 22:10, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Your supposition as to why the redirect was created is likely right. I created it, but really don't recall at this point (that was ten years ago). I certainly don't object to the deletion. Epastore (talk) 00:59, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Coombe Road railway station

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Woodside and South Croydon Joint Railway. --BDD (talk) 15:51, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Station itself was on a different alignment/location to that of the tram stop that allegedly "replaced" it. Nordic Dragon 07:48, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Hold off I will take this one. It should be somewhere on the Southern Railway when the Big Four were put together in 1922 but I am not sure it is. In Flanders and Swann there is a line I think that at gainside and Woodside the grass grows high on tamborough halt and meeting street. (This is the Beeching Axe). It is probably all right but I take it. Si Trew (talk) 11:49, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Taken. Why would a railway station be a tram stop? Some railways in the UK have been converted into Light Railways and it maybe that this is one of them but a light railway is not a tram. Believe me I ride on a tram every day. Si Trew (talk) 11:51, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know what you mean that you'll take it, but it was clearly on the W&SC, the article says so. Coombe Lane tram stop is a different place entirely. And to your other point: Toronto has at least four trams that stop at railway stations. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 15:52, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I mean I'll take it and look it up as I have done a lot of railway articles. I do not think this makes much sense. I know, as the great cowboy said, onto to Toronto pronto Tonto I am not sure if this makes sense at EN :WP. Si Trew (talk) 22:12, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Sheffield will also be running trams on the heavy rail line to Rotherham soon. :) Sceptre (talk) 12:27, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment would that not be at all confused with the Croydon Tramway? I deliberately do not look things up before commenting because I think if I would be confused other readers mimght be confused, then it lets other editors make the judgment call. I am aware that the two are dfferent things of course. User:SimonTrew editing as IP. For all I know they might have hatnotes to each other but I doubt they do or should. 84.3.187.196 (talk) 07:48, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Well there ya go I am wrong. Pretty much no chance of confusing when we don't have an article on the Croydon Tramway. Doing the um railway infoboxes is rather a fiddle, isn't it. I keep meaning to make a kinda likttle graphical editor that you can just plonk the symbols in. However several browsers still lay them out badly although carefully designed (in my experience Android seems particulalry bad at it). 84.3.187.196 (talk) 07:50, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
84.3.187.196/SimonTrew Its under Croydon Tramlink. Nordic Dragon 07:13, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Cookies Bite Size Life Lessons

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 09:37, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure on this one. I can see how it was made as {{R from other punctuation}} but does it make any sense. The Cookie Monster also gives lessons on how to eat cookies, God bless Jim Henson he did so much work teaching children God will bless him more than I could ever. His career started out in teaching children Si Trew (talk) 03:45, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

change to Delete the no one is using it argument swayed me. Legacypac (talk) 08:58, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
off-topic
Why are there so many songs about rainbows/ and what's on the other side ?/ Rainbows are visions/ And only illusions/ And rainbows have nothing to hide/ So I've been told and some fuse to believe it/ I'll prove them wrong wait and see. Some day we'll find it the rainbow connection the dreamers the lovers and me.
Now who said that any wish should be heard and answered if wished on the Morning Star? Somebody thought of that and someone believed it and look where it's got us so far. / What's so amazing that keeps us stargazing and what do you think we might see?. Someday we'll find it the Rainbow Connection the lovers, the dreamers and me.
All of us under its spell, I know that it's probably magic. Si Trew (talk) 11:58, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Up now to a well top B (pick any key, I only know B, cos I am the Boys in the Band. If you don't know a tune I have to fluff it, on occasion I've been known to muff it, we just tell the audience to stuff it. One to three Freddie play another intro ready first in the bar ha ha ha ha ha whenever there's a break in the show Pick any key we only know B cos we are the Boys in the Band. We are the boys who make all the noise wheenever there's a break in the show, Pick any key we only know B, cos we are th Boys in the Band. Written by the very much underappreciated Colin Sell) I presume he does not want to be too much acknowledged for his whacking out humour like that but well to me it makes me eyes water to thing that a musician of his quality could do a bit of bashing out just for fun. Si Trew (talk) 12:08, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I think he performed it during the interval of Two Old Farts in The Night. which the great William Rushton and Barry Cryer performed for many years but it is very hard for me to get kinda RS on this one. Rushton's daughter actually sung the intro if I remember correctly. I am probably wrong. Si Trew (talk) 12:12, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@SimonTrew: you asked me to check you when your joviality gets out of hand, and well frankly this is nonsense. It has nothing to do with discussion of this redirect at all, and can only serve to confuse other editors who are trying to understand your arguments. In as gently and collegial a way as I can say it, it may be in your best interest to take a break for a bit. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 13:33, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Lorilee

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Lorilee (disambiguation) which CoffeeWithMarkets has helpfully created. (non-admin closure) Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 13:35, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure about this one. I don't know quite the correct spelling but Lorelei King I think played the part of well all the women's parts on the Marx Brothers' retake on Radio 4 back in the eighties. We have Lorelei King so this could be a bit WP:RFD#D5 confusing. Maybe DAB it but I am not sure where to DAB it. Si Trew (talk) 03:10, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The thing is @Ivanvector: here is where my confusion comes in. Lorelei King played the women's parts on a series on BBC Radio 4 in which she played opposite I forget whom as the women's parts. So now having "craker" when they played Animal Crackers I could see would be a bit confusing what do you think? I am probably going around the houses. She essentially was playing the character that Margaret Dumont played in the originals. Si Trew (talk) 03:18, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
In Shyster, Flywheel and Shyster which we seem not to have she was the secretary. Si Trew (talk) 03:19, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I can see that being confusing but I think you're overthinking it. This redirect is "Lorilee", not "Lorelei". I think the potential for confusion is actually quite small, notwithstanding your own confusion. We don't redirect porridge to oatmeal because I'm not quite sure what's in my breakfast bowl, you know? Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 03:24, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neelix redirects get you like that cos my brain works in mysterios way the wonders to behold. If you call it I shall quite happily accept it but but you are on Canuck time and I am on about nine hours ahead of you so let's not get into that cos I imagine you need your pit soon, the sun is rising here for me. It will be a nice day I think. I have a rose in my lapel and am suited and booted so now I can go out dressed and proper. I put the roses the bulbs in an old bathtub in the back and they did beautifully this year. Hungarian Róza that is not too difficult to learn, Si Trew (talk) 03:55, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
What is in your breakfast bowl
Is mostly chaff you know old soul
It is just made by Willam K
To sell the stuff the other way
But I prefer some eggs and bacon
Then again may be mistaken
Take the chaff out then you're left
With not much else you are bereft
04:01, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
porridge should actually redirect to Porridge as {{R from other punctuation}}. Have can will worms. Si Trew (talk) 04:06, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I think @Ivanvector: should try a diet of worms for his brekkie tomorrow. Yeah User:Tavix has the right call on this one but my hand although better is not perfect for me to do the fiddling with the DAB. That would be the best way to do it. Si Trew (talk) 04:10, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yep Speedily withdrawn by nominator me. Thanks for doing it. And this is how we achieve consensus quickly without no argy-bargy. Sorry I could not do it but that makes a lot more sense. Si Trew (talk) 11:29, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Academic Renewal

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 May 24#Academic Renewal

Charles Murray (author)

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. JohnCD (talk) 09:37, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure on this one. (Neelix redirect) could be {{R to DAB}} but considering that John Murray is a fairly well known imprint of what I think now ultimately is part of News International I am not sure if the Charles at the front helps or hinders. Si Trew (talk) 02:55, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep - I'll go with Neelix's own explanation on this one: there are multiple Charleses Murray who are authors. They're listed on the dab page. I don't see it obvious that there are several who are primarily known as authors, but readers will find what they're looking for there. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 03:08, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
seems to be off-topic
Actually I was thinking of Jonathan Murray does that make more sense? Si Trew (talk) 03:13, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
No, because Jonathan Murray's name is not Charles. Do you mean that Jonathan Murray is a primary topic for the surname Murray? Because I'll direct your attention to Anne Murray. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 03:15, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Really it is the (author) at the back of it that sticks out like a sore thumb to me as indeed does mine. Si Trew (talk) 03:21, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Still not quite with you, Jonathan Murray is also not an author, at least not primarily, and not moreso than Anne Murray. It's an {{R from incomplete disambiguation}}, disambiguated but still ambiguous. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 03:26, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
No Jonathan Murray is a British publisher at least it says on may of the books I have. I think we have been going across each other on this one I am standing off. Nem irók hanem kiado. Si Trew (talk) 04:15, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Right I have to find a book published by J. Murray. OOOOHHH that is my mistake it is Murray not Murrey. Oh shit that is where I went wrong. I was thinking of John Murray (publisher) still don't know what to do with this one. Si Trew (talk) 04:18, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - While there are many people known by this name worldwide, this appears to be the biggest one known specifically for being a writer versus being whatever else. The redirect is helpful and should be kept. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 05:06, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The current target is a disambiguation page. Did you mean to suggest retargeting to a specific person? Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 10:43, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, retarget to Charles Murray (political scientist), I mean CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 09:10, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Ninth generation of video game consoles

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 09:35, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--Sonic_N800 (talk) 00:40, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2016_May_13&oldid=1088109150"