Jump to content

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 13

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

November 13

[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on November 13, 2024.

Zhuhui Stadium

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 21#Zhuhui Stadium

Baby gaetz

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 21#Baby gaetz

Draft:British politician sex

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:23, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Phrase is not mentioned in target article. This appears to have initially been created as a redirect in draftspace, which was then moved to draftspace at British politician sex, which now points to Profumo affair#In popular culture. 2A0E:1D47:9085:D200:110E:9901:345E:297F (talk) 21:09, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

SI

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 08:58, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This has a crazy number of potential meanings to point to any specific one. I propose retargeting this to the disambiguation page, Si, which lists dozens of possible meanings. BD2412 T 21:08, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

SI makes sense as a redirect to International System of Units because that's the abbreviation all schoolchildren learn. And if I type "Si" I get the disambiguation page, which also makes sense. No need to change a thing. Dondervogel 2 (talk) 22:20, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Re: "that's the abbreviation all schoolchildren learn". In what country? Certainly not in the United States. Here schoolchildren probably think Sports Illustrated. BD2412 T 00:40, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Should I have said "90 % of all schoolchildren"? Try googling "what does the abbreviation SI stand for?" Dondervogel 2 (talk) 07:58, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with Dondervogel 2. My impression is that SI is most commonly used to refer to the International System of Units, and is the most common thing for a person to write when they want to refer to the International System of Units. Jc3s5h (talk) 23:02, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep WP:SMALLDETAILS matter. International System of Units is by far the primary topic for SI (with both letters capitalized). Looking at the disamb page, there is very few other articles that is a plausible referee because there are either too ambiguous, or is spelled with "Si". There is a hatnote if the target was not what the reader intended. Ca talk to me! 13:20, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Scientific units are always gonna be more relevant than some random sports magazine. TeapotsOfDoom (talk) 18:31, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Exactly. No reader expects simply typing extremely vague search term "SI" to land them on a sports magazine or a random Indian ministry. No one calls kg, m, s, etc by their full name International System of Units, but by its acronym SI. Ca talk to me! 00:45, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Diya Chitale

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:23, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No point in this redirect, there is no much coverage about her in this page. just mentioned in couple of tables. should be deleted until an actual article is made. Sports2021 (talk) 20:51, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Mineraft controversies

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:17, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Typo for the main article is plausible. Typo for a subtopic is ehhh. TeapotsOfDoom (talk) 20:38, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Not a squid

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:17, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously? TeapotsOfDoom (talk) 20:32, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Herobrain

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy keep per WP:SK#4. ✗plicit 00:19, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is a bit too much off to be an accident. Intentional misspelling or a bad pun, I don't really see this one getting much mileage.
You Were Supposed to Be The Hero, Bryan! TeapotsOfDoom (talk) 20:09, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep Plausible mondegreen Ca talk to me! 13:21, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Adult contemporary progressive death metal

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 21#Adult contemporary progressive death metal

Purple francis

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was restore and send to AfD. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 09:04, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WTF? That's a literal joke character created by the fandom. This redirect needs to be put in the bin. TeapotsOfDoom (talk) 18:22, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i can't believe i'm saying this, but restore. with mild prejudice against afd, if also with no prejudice against draftifying or userifying. this was the last diff before what seems to be a bold blar, and unless my eyes are bamboozling me, those look a lot like reliable sources. no opinion on restoring his section in the l4d article, which was similarly boldly removed in july cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 19:48, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Media coverage of Donald Trump

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Public image of Donald Trump. ✗plicit 00:24, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Public image of Donald Trump looks like a better target. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 17:07, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Suppport Provides a more general overview than either of his presidencies. Ca talk to me! 13:23, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

List of presidential trips made by Donald Trump (2026)

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ThadeusOfNazereth(he/him)Talk to Me! 17:31, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:TOOSOON, no mention / relevant information at the target, making this a misleading redirect. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:55, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Criticism of George Bush

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 20#Criticism of George Bush

Criticism of Donald Trump

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 21#Criticism of Donald Trump

Ryan Girdusky

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the redirect's undeletion. ThadeusOfNazereth(he/him)Talk to Me! 17:32, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not explained in target article. -- Beland (talk) 16:28, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

James J. Finn

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 20#James J. Finn

Cricoarytenoid

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 20#Cricoarytenoid

Chingisid

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 24#Chingisid

Temple of Charents

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 04:05, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No hits for this phrase in Google. Happy to withdraw if an Armenian source is found. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 02:47, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Mugwump (Miscellaneous Uses)

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 04:04, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

extremely unlikely redirect. Nobody is gonna be looking for a disambiguation page by searching for a "Miscellaneous uses" page. Gaismagorm (talk) 02:16, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

1-naphthoquinone

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 04:04, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no such compound. Delete to avoid confusion. Mdewman6 (talk) 01:51, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. It's at best a confusing/ambiguous chemical name. In a search of the chemical literature I do find a few examples of "1-naphthoquinone", but in each case it appears to be a typo and either "1,2-naphthoquinone" or "1,4-naphthoquinone" is the intended meaning - so it's a very unlikely but not impossible search term in my opinion. (If someone were to search the term "1-naphthoquinone", naphthoquinone would definitely be the best place to send them, though.) Marbletan (talk) 18:24, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

TW/PREFS

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 04:04, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Last time I checked, there is no mainspace redirects for WP:TWINKLE and this is like trying way to hard to be a subpage long after mainspace subpages were discontinued. TeapotsOfDoom (talk) 00:40, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No new editor(or anyone unaware of Wikipedia project space) would be searching for Twinkle preferences. Ca talk to me! 01:53, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

WPIRS

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 04:04, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Another typo WP:XNR TeapotsOfDoom (talk) 00:36, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think it stands for "Wikipedia is a reliable source". Not in common use. Unnecessary WP:XNR. Delete Ca talk to me! 01:54, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I stand corrected by Cogsan, but my opinion remains same. Ca talk to me! 13:28, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
delete. originally created as a redirect to "identifying reliable sources", so it's at least not a tpyo. still an unnecessary xnr though cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 19:30, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

2-Aminonaphthalenel

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 04:04, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We have the correct 2-Aminonaphthalene, but the extra "l" on the end makes this a radical or substituent, but this is not discussed at the target. We also don't have naphthalenel. Delete to avoid confusion and prevent astonishment. Mdewman6 (talk) 00:34, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That redirect is just a dumb mistake by me.--Smokefoot (talk) 02:27, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Smokefoot is this grounds for g7? cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 20:22, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. It is an unusual typo, a very unlikely search term, and admittedly created in error. Marbletan (talk) 18:27, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Deja moo

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 04:03, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mainspace redirect to a short essay feels a bit wrong, especially when the redirect is a phase that probably didn't originate from Wikipedia. TeapotsOfDoom (talk) 00:33, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No new editor(or anyone unaware of Wikipedia project space) would be searching for this random humorous essay. Ca talk to me! 01:55, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
delete per nom, ca, and wp:xnr, and as a bad pun cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 19:25, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Snaghai

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 04:03, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible typo at worst and bad pun at best. TeapotsOfDoom (talk) 00:30, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

whoa, agf, please. you don't just accuse someone of making a pun like this
delete per nom but the other way around, which is to say as an implausible misspelling at best and bad pun at worst. results gave me like 3 instances of people making this mistake, plus some weird wikipedia thing called "redirects for discussion" (no idea what that is). views are similarly reflective of its implausibility cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 19:22, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

S'hai

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. ✗plicit 04:06, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This doesn't really appear to be a very common abbreviation. TeapotsOfDoom (talk) 00:10, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

delete per nom. results gave me nothing related to shanghai cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 19:26, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment What else could this refer to? It is analogous to S'pore for Singapore. Ca talk to me! 13:26, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
there's some unnotable musician called s.hai, i guess. keen eyes will notice, though, that that name does not contain an apostrophe cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 16:48, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Granger. Ca talk to me! 01:43, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2024_November_13&oldid=1259245603"