Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Plyjacks

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  • Supporting evidence: Plyjacks has been, in the past, a serial sockpuppeteer and disruptive influence. However, he recently returned to request an unblock. He claims to have not edited in 2 months, nor created any sockpuppets in that time to evade his original block. Given the belief that people may learn their lesson and that he seems to wish to become a productive editor, I am asking for a checkuser to verify his story. Above is a list of sockpuppets and IP addresses which he is known to have edited under, and which he has admitted publicly to operating. Could a checkuser please see if he is telling the truth? If he is, I plan to bring this to ANI to see if there is consensus to unblock him; we have done similar things in the past for other users who turned over a new leaf. If he is not telling the truth, this will give us the chance to turn him down and return to the rest of our business. Thank you. --Jayron32.talk.contribs 17:29, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The following are Plyjacks socks that are not blocked:
  1. Timaroyhack21 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  2. Kcody114 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  3. Timmknows (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

His socks were last active on September 30. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 18:08, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]