Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Clerks
Noticeboard
[edit]Clerks' Noticeboard
- recent changes
- purge this page
- view or discuss this template
Request name | Motions | Initiated | Votes |
---|---|---|---|
Covert canvassing and proxying in the Israel-Arab conflict topic area | 6 November 2024 | 0/1/0 |
No cases have recently been closed (view all closed cases).
Request name | Motions | Case | Posted |
---|---|---|---|
Amendment request: Palestine-Israel articles (AE referral) | Motion | (orig. case) | 17 August 2024 |
Arbitration enforcement referral: Nableezy, et al | none | (orig. case) | 7 November 2024 |
Clarification request: Referrals from Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard to the full Committee | none | none | 7 November 2024 |
No arbitrator motions are currently open.
This noticeboard's primary purpose is to to attract the attention of the clerks to a particular matter by non-clerks. Non-clerks are welcome to comment on this page in the event that the clerks appear to have missed something.
Private matters
The clerks may be contacted privately, in the event a matter could not be prudently addressed publicly (i.e., on this page), by composing an email to clerks-llists.wikimedia.org; only the clerk team and individual arbitrators have access to emails sent to that list.
Procedures
A procedural reference for clerks (and arbitrators) is located here.
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 4 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
Arbitrators, clerks and trainees: Please coordinate your actions through the mailing list. The purpose of this page is for editors who are not clerks to request clerk assistance.
discrepancy in implementation notes in Backlash to Diversity and Inclusion
[edit]The proposed remedy contentious topic (yasuke) is logged as having no support votes, but it should be logged as having one. Apologies if this is the wrong place to put this. beepboopbwaph (talk) 15:23, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks, fixed. SilverLocust 💬 16:10, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
ARBPIA5 motion at ARCA
[edit]Refers to Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification_and_Amendment#Motion_5:_PIA5_Case.
For motion 5 (ARBPIA5) it states that there are 10 active arbs and since 1 has abstained, 5 is a majority. However, L235 (an inactive arb) has voted on it, so the majority needs to be altered to 6.
I'm unsure if that affects the numbers for any of the other motions (or indeed any other cases) but it clearly does for this one. Black Kite (talk) 20:24, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Marked as active on the one motion. L235, we'll assume you're not active on the other 6 motions unless you indicate otherwise or vote on them. SilverLocust 💬 20:49, 3 November 2024 (UTC)