United States v. International Minerals & Chemical Corp.

United States Supreme Court

402 U.S. 558

United States  v.  International Minerals & Chemical Corp.

Certified Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio

No. 557.  Argued: April 26, 1971 --- Decided: June 1, 1971

Appellee was charged by information with shipping sulfuric and hydrofluosilicic acids in interstate commerce and that it "did knowingly fail to show on the shipping papers the required classification of said property, to wit, Corrosive Liquid, in violation of 49 C.F.R. 173.437," issued pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 834 (a). Section 834 (f) provides that whoever "knowingly violates any such regulation" shall be fined and imprisoned. The District Court dismissed the information, holding that it did not charge a "knowing violation" of the regulation.

Held: The statute does not signal an exception to the general rule that ignorance of the law is no excuse. The word "knowingly" in the statute pertains to knowledge of the facts, and where, as here, dangerous products are involved, the probability of regulation is so great that anyone who is aware that he is in possession of or dealing with them must be presumed to be aware of the regulation. Pp. 560-565.

Reversed.

DOUGLAS, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which BURGER, C.J., and BLACK, WHITE, MARSHALL, and BLACKMUN, JJ., joined. STEWART, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which HARLAN and BRENNAN, JJ., joined, post, p. 565.

John F. Dienelt argued the cause for the United States pro hac vice. With him on the briefs were Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Wilson, and Beatrice Rosenberg.

Harold E. Spencer argued the cause for appellee. With him on the brief was Charles J. McCarthy.

Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).