User contributions for 1.145.231.64

Results for 1.145.231.64 talk block log logs global block log abuse log
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Search for contributionsExpandCollapse
⧼contribs-top⧽
⧼contribs-date⧽

8 January 2024

7 January 2024

  • 07:1307:13, 7 January 2024 diff hist +603 Wiktionary:Requested entries (English) X: :Definitely could occur in mathematics, but not sure if it qualifies for English. In that case we would likely have to include also ''[[i<sup>th</sup>]]'', ''[[m<sup>th</sup>]]'' etc. — not to mention ''[[N<sup>th</sup>]]'', etc. — because there's no restriction on which pronumeral may be used as an index (for enumeration) in mathematics. (Personally I would apply superscript for clarity, but no doubt you will find some instances without that formatting.) —DIV (~~~~)
  • 07:0507:05, 7 January 2024 diff hist +205 Wiktionary:Requested entries (English) O: :NOTE: existing entry for one up is messed up, using hyphenated examples that belong at one-up. —DIV. (~~~~)
  • 07:0207:02, 7 January 2024 diff hist +594 Wiktionary:Requested entries (English) O: :Is there a case to implement (ideally to be done automatically by computer wizardry) ''redirects'' for variants like "off his own bat", "off her own bat", "off their own bat", "off your own bat", "off my own bat", "off our own bat". (Is that enough?) Otherwise searchers (presumably like the original correspondent) may fail to find the existing entry. Or would that open up a can of worms, with requests to extend to "off our own bat'''s'''" and "off '''thine''' own bat"? —DIV (~~~~)
  • 06:5406:54, 7 January 2024 diff hist +15 Wiktionary:Requested entries (English) P: Agree with all of the remarks, but they're quite lengthy, so perhaps this'll be less intrusive, while at the same time keeping all of the 'essay' text recognisable as a distinct whole. (Not sure why there's a left-margin alignment glitch.) —DIV