Talk:Ba'athist Iraq
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Imetsia in topic RFD discussion: April–May 2021
The following information has failed Wiktionary's deletion process (permalink).
It should not be re-entered without careful consideration.
SOP.--Tibidibi (talk) 13:49, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. This is similar to Nazi Germany and Communist China. The country Iraq was not Ba'athist, but the regime was. --Lambiam 23:44, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
- If a Pink Unicorn Party took power in Foobaristan, no one would have any trouble figuring out what "Pink Unicornist Foobaristan" meant. Chuck Entz (talk) 14:28, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
- Keep; agree with Lambiam. 🔥शब्दशोधक🔥 04:35, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete, these are mere popular designations to distinguish between ruling regimes with very high SOP potential. I think official titles and some historiographic names are includible, but it is reasonable to draw a line somewhere. Do we also need entries like Habsburg Spain, Carlist Spain, constitutional Spain, monarchical/monarchist Spain, Republican Spain, Francoist Spain?
←₰-→Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk) 13:32, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: it wasn't the official name of the country. This is similar to "Republican America" or "communist Vietnam". Equinox ◑ 14:35, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
- Missing information. This is interesting. I am very naïve about the constitutional history of the Iraq. What was there that distinguishes the epoch substantially rather than accidentally? Nazi Germany is not just a government grafted upon a state but a constitutional crisis. Ba'athist Iraq is what? Without determination of the facts there can be no sentence about the SOPness of this term. Reign of an ideology or particular members of government, as in the definition, is not enough. Fay Freak (talk) 19:51, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per Lingo and Equinox. Imetsia (talk) 17:01, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
- RFD-deleted. Imetsia (talk) 17:03, 31 May 2021 (UTC)