www.medigraphic.org.

mx

Revista Mexicana de Ortodoncia

Vol. 2, No. 4 October-December 2014
CASE REPORT
pp 265-272

Myofunctional approach for open bite correction in a patient

with severe upper incisor external apical root resorption
Manejo miofuncional de mordida abierta anterior en un paciente
con reabsorción radicular apical externa severa de incisivos superiores
Nancy Verdugo Álvarez,* Francisca Hara Ortíz§

ABSTRACT RESUMEN

Root resorption is a complication of orthodontic treatment that La reabsorción radicular es una complicación que se puede presen-
may occur in various degrees of severity. However, considerable tar en el tratamiento ortodóncico en diversos grados. Asimismo, en
root resorption can also be appreciated in patients where root pacientes cuyo desarrollo radicular es interrumpido por diferentes
development has been interrupted by different circumstances during causas puede observarse un acortmiento radicular. Fue admitida
the orthodontic treatment. A 9-year-old female patient was admitted una paciente femenina de 9 años de edad después de un tratamien-
after being in a treatment with fixed appliances for 3 years. She to interceptivo de 3 años de duración, que presentó características
presented clinical features of anterior open bite and the radiographic clínicas de mordida abierta anterior. En la valoración radiográﾙca se
evaluation showed important root resorption of the four maxillary observó un acortamiento considerable de los cuatro incisivos supe-
incisors. It was decided to use a more conservative approach riores. Se tomó la decisión de no colocar aparatología ﾙja de forma
instead of ﾙxed appliances during the initial phase of treatment and inicial y abordar el problema con una terapia muscular funcional.
a myofunctional therapy was chosen. Assessment of the upper Después de evaluar la permeabilidad de las vías aéreas superiores,
airways was performed before placing a tongue crib accompanied se colocó una trampa de lengua y mediante ejercicios peribucales
by exercises of the orbicularis oris muscle complex, after one month se consiguió cerrar la mordida tras un mes de citas de control. Al
of follow-up appointments, bite closure was obtained. Chances of guiar el crecimiento esquelético y modiﾙcar el comportamiento mus-
relapse are reduced with appropriate growth guidance and changes cular del paciente se reduce la posibilidad de recidiva.
in the muscular behavior of young patients.

Key words: Open-bite, root resorption, myofunctional therapy, tongue thrust disorder.
Palabras clave: Mordida abierta, reabsorción radicular, terapia miofuncional, deglución atípica.

INTRODUCTION forces applied on teeth in a short period of time may

produce root resorption.2
Root shortening, a specific type of external root Root resorption associated with orthodontic
resorption, is an orthodontic treatment complication that treatment is more evident in patients on whom
occurs in mild degrees on most occasions in patients heavy, long-term and in an adverse direction forces,
who undergo important orthodontic movements. were applied or when the tooth is not capable of
However, it is rare that such reabsorption is severe withstanding normal forces due to a deterioration of
enough to create a clinical problem. Currently, it has not the support system by factors such as pressure of the
been reported in the literature the spontaneous loss of adjacent teeth, periodontal inflammation, periapical
www.medigraphic.org.mx
a dental organ due to the root resorption by iatrogeny.
External apical root resorption is the loss of root
inflammation, tooth reimplantation, severe occlusal
trauma, dentoalveolar trauma with partial or total
structure involving the apical region to such a degree
that can it be detected by means of dentoalveolar
radiographs. The reabsorption can be physiological,
* Graduated from Orthodontics Department.
as is the exfoliation of temporary teeth, or pathologic, §
Professor of the Orthodontics Department.
when it affects permanent teeth. It may be deﾙned as
a defense mechanism by which the body responds Posgraduate Studies and Research Division. Faculty of Dentistry,
to external or internal stimuli and takes place in hard National Autonomous University of Mexico.
tissues.1 External root resorption is probably the most This article can be read in its full version in the following page:
common sequelae of orthodontic treatment, because http://www.medigraphic.com/ortodoncia

Æ"4234"Wpkxgtukfcf"Pcekqpcn"Cwv„pqoc"fg"Ofizkeq."Hcewnvcf"fg"Qfqpvqnqi c0Vjku"ku"cp"qrgp"ceeguu"ctvkeng"wpfgt"vjg"EE"D[/PE/PF"nkegpug"
*jvvr<11etgcvkxgeqooqpu0qti1nkegpugu1d{/pe/pf16021+" "
 Verdugo AN et al. Myofunctional approach for open bite correction
266

avulsion, tumors and cysts, endocrine and metabolic CASE REPORT

disorders or idiopathic factors. 3,4 In addition, the
severity and type of malocclusion are important factors Female patient, 9 years of age, attends the
that must be taken into consideration since it has been Orthodontics Clinic at the Postgraduate Studies
observed that an increased overjet and open bites and Research Division of the National Autonomous
have a greater risk of root resorption.5,6 University of Mexico. Upon interrogation, the patient’s
Classic orthodontics consists of fixed appliances mother explained that the patient underwent a previous
for solving dental malocclusions, but sometimes it orthodontic treatment for 3 years to correct the anterior
is better to use functional forces instead of stronger open bite. Her chief concern was the relapse of the
mechanics. Continuous and heavy forces produce anterior open bite four months after appliance removal.
greater root resorption by the generated friction and Upon clinical examination, a convex proﾙle, chin muscles
the recovery inability of the periodontal ligament.4 hypertonicity, anterior open bite and atypical swallowing
were observed accompanied by a mouth-breathing habit.
BACKGROUND
INITIAL RECORDS
At the beginning of the last century, the orthodontic
community was shocked by the root damage that may Extra and intraoral photographic records were
occur due to orthodontic movement. 1 The condition obtained (Figures 1 and 2) as well as cast study
was more evident in subjects where the forces applied models. Clinically, an anterior open bite in the mixed
on the teeth were strong and applied for long periods of dentition stage was observed. It was also observed
time, in inadequate directions or in individuals whose
teeth were unable to withstand normal forces due to
the weakening of the support system. Root resorption
was located in the outer surface of the root and could
be observed in the cervical, middle and apical thirds.3,4
Controversy exists in clinical and laboratory research
reports on root resorption compared to the incidence and
amount of external apical root resorption. The mean for
root resorption varies from 0.2 mm to 2.93 mm, while the
prevalence of radiographic detectable resorption varies
from 0 to 100%.7-9 Such controversies may be attributed
to the considerable differences in the studied tooth type,
sample sizes, follow-up duration, type of dental movement,
measurement methods and patient’s characteristics.1
The etiology of root resorption has two phases: a
stimulus and a re-stimulation. In the first phase, the Figure 1. Frontal and lateral facial photographs. Increased
stimulus affects non-mineralized tissues, such as the pre- lower third and chin muscle hypertonicity may be observed.
cement or cementhoid tissue which covers the external
root surface. This stimulus may be mechanical (by dental
trauma or orthodontic treatment) or chemical (dental
bleaching with high concentrations of hydrogen peroxide).2
The exposed mineralized tissue is colonized by
www.medigraphic.org.mx
multinucleated cells, which initiate the resorption
process. However, if there are no more stimuli to the
reabsorbing cells, the process will end spontaneously.
The repair with cement will happen in two to three
weeks, if the affected surface does not involve a large
area. If the affected area is large, the cells have the
ability to invade the root before the cementoblasts
can colonize the surface and generate anchylosis. In
the second phase, the continuation of the resorption
process depends on continuous odontoclasts Figure 2. Frontal and lateral intraoral photographs, where an
stimulation or re-stimulation by infection or pressure.2 anterior open bite in the mixed dentition is observed.
Revista Mexicana de Ortodoncia 2014;2 (4): 265-272
267

Figure 3. Initial panoramic radiograph where the upper

incisors root shortening may be observed.

Figure 5. Initial overbite depth indicator (ODI).

A B

Figure 6. A. Frontal intraoral radiograph that shows the

lingual grid. B. Myofunctional exercises where both lips exert
presurre towads the dentoalveolar complex.

Figure 4. Lateral cephalography that shows mandibular is obtained from the difference between the mandibular
hyperdivergency as well as severe incisor proclination. plane-AB plane angle and the Frankfort plane-palatal and
plane angle. Normal values are 74.5o ± 6. The patient’s
ODI showed an open bite tendency with a 59 degrees
during clinical examination that the patient showed
negative value compared to the norm (Figure 5).
a tongue thrusting and mouth breathing habit. The
lower facial third was increased and chin muscle
TREATMENT
hypertonicity was observed at lip closure.
In the radiographic assessment, an important
A lingual stainless steel grid was placed in the
root shortening was observed in the upper incisors
upper arch as a reminder for the correction of the
producing a 1:2 crown-root ratio (Figure 3). In the lateral
lingual thrust. Exercises of the perioral musculature
www.medigraphic.org.mx
head ﾙlm, lip incompetence was conﾙrmed and narrow
upper airways were noted so a medical consultation
were instructed, pressing the anterior segment of
the dental arches to correct the anterior open bite as
with an otorhinolaryngologist was suggested to rule
well as the mouth breathing habit (Figure 6). Control
out a possible upper airway obstruction (Figure 4).
appointments were scheduled monthly to assess
The patient was diagnosed as a skeletal class I with
changes in both dental and lip position.
anterior open bite due to an hyperdivergent mandible
and severe incisor proclination according to Ricketts Treatment progress
cephalometric analysis (Table I). To make the analysis
more complete, we decided to measure the overbite After the ﾙrst month of treatment, complete closure of
depth indicator (ODI), which is a specific method to the anterior open bite was observed and it was decided
assess open bite. It was proposed by Dr. Kim,10 and it to postpone as much as possible the placement of ﾙxed
 Verdugo AN et al. Myofunctional approach for open bite correction
268

Table I. Initial patient values for the Ricketts cephalometric analysis.

Ricketts analysis

Dental relationships Normal value Patient

Molar relationship -3 mm ± 3 0 mm
Canine relationship -2 mm ± 3 mm -
Overjet 2.5 mm ± 2 4 mm
Overbite 2.5 mm ± 2 -3 mm
Lower incisor extrusion 1.25 mm ± 2 0 mm
Interincisal angle 130o ± 6 110o
Skeletal problem
Facial convexity 2 mm ± 2 1 mm
Lower face height 47o ± 4 45o
Skeletal-dental relationships
U6 Position Age + 3 16 mm
L1 Protrusion 1 mm ± 2.3 5 mm
U1 Protrusion 3.5 mm ± 2.3 10 mm
L1 Inclination 22o ± 4 28o
U1 Inclination 28o ± 4 42o
Posterior height- Occl Plane 0 mm ± 3 1 mm
Esthetics
Lip protrusion -2 mm ± 2 4 mm
Upper lip length 24 mm ± 2 25 mm
Occlusal plane -3.5 mm -4 mm
Craniofacial relation
Facial depth 87o ± 3 90o
Facial axis 90o ± 3.5 90o
Facial taper 68o ± 3.5 66o
Mandibular plane 26o ± 4.5 24o
Palatal plane inclination 1o ± 3.5 -8o
Maxillary depth 90o ± 3 92o
Maxillary height 53o ± 3 56o
Craniofacial relation (Cranial structure)
Cranial deﾚection 27o ± 3 28o
Anterior cranial length 55 mm ± 2.5 49 mm
Posterior face height 55 mm ± 3.3 52 mm
Ramus position 76o ± 3 71o
Porion location -39 mm ± 2 -37 mm
Mandibular arc 26o ± 4 32o
Mandibular length 65 mm ± 2.7 60 mm

appliances in the upper arch until dental stability of the During the entire treatment, orofacial myofunctional
upper anterior teeth was obtained. There was a decrease exercises were maintained and a periodical
of the lower facial third after achieving closure of the radiographic control of the upper incisors was
www.medigraphic.org.mx
anterior open bite. When an adequate overbite was
achieved, 018-slot Edgewise appliances were placed in
performed for evaluation of any modiﾙcation of their
root anatomy. Once dental stability, was observed, it
the lower arch to begin dental alignment. Once the upper was decided to place a 0.016 x 0.016 steel archwire
permanent canines erupted, we placed appliances in the with a bend for negative root torque on the upper
upper arch without including the four upper incisors. A incisors (Figure 9).
0.135 Flex Twist archwire was used (Figure 7). The bite correction was maintained during the
Once the alignment of the upper canines, was following appointments until appliance removal was
achieved was 0.016 steel Utility type archwire was decided. For retention, a circumferential retainer was
used in the anterior segment. Three months after we placed with an acrylic coat for the labial portion of
decided to place appliances in the upper incisors and the incisors both on the upper and lower arches. The
0.135 ﾚex Twist previously formed archwire (Figure 8). final radiographic evaluation showed a significant
Revista Mexicana de Ortodoncia 2014;2 (4): 265-272
269

Figure 10. Comparison between initial and ﾙnal lateral head

Figure 7. Photographs after two years of treatment. A
ﾙlm that shows the skeletal and dental changes.
decrease in the lower facial third and lip competence may
be noticed as well as the correction of the anterior open bite
correction.

A B

Figure 8. A. Utility-type archwire placement in the anterior

segment. B. Intraoral photographs four months after placing
ﾙxed appliances on the upper incisors.

Figure 11. Final overbite depth indicator (ODI).

skeletal changes were reﾚected in the patient’s facial

appearance where a favorable change in proﾙle and
smile could be observed (Figure 12).
Six months after orthodontic treatment, a clinical
exam was conducted to assess the patient’s occlusal
condition as well as retainer use. We observed an
improvement in dental interdigitation compared to the
day of appliance removal (Figure 13). Also, an adequate
lip competence was observed and the absence of the
Figure 9. Post-treatment intraoral photographs. atypical swallowing habit that the patient showed at the
beginning of treatment (Figure 14).
www.medigraphic.org.mx
change in the direction of mandibular growth as well DISCUSSION
as in the incisor position (Figure 10). Also, a new
cephalometric analysis was performed to compare In spite of the fact that open bite is known to have
the results with initial cephalometric values (Table a multifactorial etiology, the muscular factor is without
II). Significant changes were found in regard to doubt one of the most important that must be taken
incisor inclination and protrusion and in the soft into consideration. In this particular case, muscle
tissues. Once again the ODI was used to compare function from both the masticatory complex and the
the skeletal changes obtained with treatment and tongue was affected resulting in an anterior open bite.
there was a positive change in the ODI value, very According to Lieberman and Gazit, 11 one of the
close to normal values value (Figure 11). Dental and predisposing factors for open bite is tongue activity,
 Verdugo AN et al. Myofunctional approach for open bite correction
270

Table II. Initial and ﾙnal cephalometric values.

Ricketts analysis

Dental relationships Normal value Initial Final

Molar relationship -3 mm ± 3 0 mm -2 mm
Canine relationship -2 mm ± 3 mm - -2 mm
Overjet 2.5 mm ± 2 4 mm 3 mm
Overbite 2.5 mm ± 2 -3 mm 1 mm
Lower incisor extrusion 1.25 mm ± 2 0 mm 0 mm
Interincisal angle 130o ± 6 110o 130o
Skeletal problem
Facial convexity 2 mm ± 2 1 mm 1 mm
Lower face height 47o ± 4 45o 43o
Skeletal-dental relationships
U6 Position Age + 3 16 mm 18 mm
L1 Protrusion 1 mm ± 2.3 5 mm 4 mm
U1 Protrusion 3.5 mm ± 2.3 10 mm 7 mm
L1 Inclination 22o ± 4 28o 22o
U1 Inclination 28o ± 4 42o 27o
Posterior height- Occl Plane 0 mm ± 3 1 mm 4 mm
Esthetics
Lip protrusion -2 mm ± 2 4 mm 0 mm
Upper lip length 24 mm ± 2 25 mm 22 mm
Occlusal plane -3.5 mm -4 mm -3 mm
Craniofacial relation
Facial depth 87o ± 3 90o 90o
Facial axis 90o ± 3.5 90o 92o
Facial taper 68o ± 3.5 66o 68o
Mandibular plane 26o ± 4.5 24o 21o
Palatal plane inclination 1o ± 3.5 -8o -6o
Maxillary depth 90o ± 3 92o 92o
Maxillary height 53o ± 3 56o 57o
Craniofacial relation (Cranial structure)
Cranial deﾚection 27o ± 3 28o 28o
Anterior cranial length 55 mm ± 2.5 49 mm 54 mm
Posterior face height 55 mm ± 3.3 52 mm 57 mm
Ramus position 76o ± 3 71o 76o
Porion location -39 mm ± 2 -37 mm -42 mm
Mandibular arc 26o ± 4 32o 37o
Mandibular length 65 mm ± 2.7 60 mm 61 mm

either as passive or active thus becoming one of the control. The patients is shown the right way in which
etiological factors of this malocclusion. A modified masticatory muscles must be used, and also the
lingual posture interferes with respiratory function correct position in which the tongue must be placed
www.medigraphic.org.mx
and has an important role in the development of an
anterior open bite. These two situations (lingual
during swallowing.12
Myofunctional therapy beneﾙts the patient, since in
posture and respiratory function) are an important addition to having an effect on the open bite, abnormal
factor combination that must be controlled before, habits are corrected and the tonicity of the orbicularis
during and after orthodontic treatment. oral muscles is improved which in turn allow lip
Patients with atypical swallowing mainly use facial competence. 13-15 It also achieves better nasal flow,
muscles to perform suction instead of swallowing. which favorably affects muscular posture and other
The specialist in communication disorders Ann functions.
Este
Bearddocumento
Ehrlichesdiscovered
elaborado por Medigraphic
that when correcting a There are several treatments for anterior open bite
pattern of atypical swallowing, one should focus on such correction sucha as molar intrusion,16 bicuspid
voluntary change of habits thus becoming easier to extractions, 17 and orthognatic surgery. 18 Molar
Revista Mexicana de Ortodoncia 2014;2 (4): 265-272
271

Figure 12.

Pre and post-treatment smile

photographs in which facial
changes may be observed.

Figure 13.

Six months post-treatment

intraoral photographs.

Figure 14.

Six months post-treatment facial

photographs.

intrusion has been among the most used method for great advantages of this treatment is its long-term
the correction of this kind of malocclusion. Due to stability and its low relapse rate.18
the difﾙculty in obtaining true molar intrusion through
the use of traditional biomechanics, nowadays the CONCLUSIONS
use of micro-implants has demonstrated greater
www.medigraphic.org.mx
effectiveness for open bite correction.16,17,19 Due to the clinical conditions of this case, we chose
In other cases it is often resorted to extraction of the
to follow a more conservative approach instead of
ﾙrst and second premolars due to their high overbite using ﾙxed appliances during the initial stage of the
stability after orthodontic treatment.17 However, vertical treatment. Based on this decision, we came up with
changes are more noticeable with second premolar the idea of using myofunctional therapy. Once the
extractions and therefore they are recommended for correction of the open bite was obtained we continued
cases with vertical growth patterns.20,21 with the next stage of treatment, placing conventional
The complexity of a severe anterior open bite ﾙxed appliances. Orthodontic treatment in early stages
increases the difficulty of conventional orthodontic of root development should be reconsidered in order
treatment, so that most of the time, its correction is to avoid root shortening specially when using heavy
through surgical-orthodontic treatment.21 One of the orthodontic forces. By guiding skeletal growth and
 Verdugo AN et al. Myofunctional approach for open bite correction
272

modifying the patient’s muscle activity the possibility of 12. Beard Ehrlich A. Training therapists for tongue thrust correction.
relapse is reduced. 2nd ed. Illinois, USA: Charles C Thomas Publisher; 1973.
13. Uner O, Darendeliler N, Bilir E. Effects of an activator on the
masseter and anterior temporal muscle activities in class II
REFERENCES malocclusions. J ClinPediatr Dent. 1999; 23 (4): 327-332.
14. Fujiki T, Inoue M, Miyawaki S, Nagasaki T, Tanimoto K, Takano-
1. Mohandesan H, Ravanmehr H, Valaei N. A radiographic analysis Yamamoto T. Relationship between maxillofacial morphology
of external apical root resorption of maxillary incisors during and deglutitive tongue movement in patients with anterior open
active orthodontic treatment. Eur J Orthod. 2007; 29 (2): 134- bite. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004; 125 (2): 160-167.
139. 15. Lowe AA, Johnston WD. Tongue and jaw muscle activity in
2. Graber M. Ortodoncia. Principios generales y técnicas. 3a Ed. response to mandibular rotations in a sample of normal and
México: Editorial Médica Panamericana; 2003. anterior open-bite subjects. Am J Orthod. 1979; 76 (5): 565-576.
3. Reitan K. Initial tissue behavior during apical root resorption. 16. Umemori M, Sugawara J, Mitani H, Nagasaka H, Kawamura H.
Angle Orthod. 1974; 44 (1): 68-82. Skeletal anchorage system for open-bite correction. Am J Orthod
4. Blake M, Woodside DG, Pharoah MJ. A radiographic comparison Dentofacial Orthop. 1999; 115 (2): 166-174.
of apical root resorption after orthodontic treatment with the 17. Janson G, Valarelli FP, Beltrão RT, de Freitas MR, Henriques
edgewise and Speed appliances. Am J Ortho Dentofacial JF. Stability of anterior open-bite extraction and nonextraction
Orthop. 1995; 108 (1): 76-84. treatment in the permanent dentition. Am J Orthod Dentofacial
5. Malmgrem O, Goldson L, Hill C, Orwin A, Petrini L, Lundberg M. Orthop. 2006; 129 (6): 768-774.
Root resorption after orthodontic treatment of traumatized teeth. 18. Profﾙt WR, Bailey LJ, Phillips C, Turvey TA. Long-term stability
Am J Orthod. 1982; 82 (6): 487-491. of surgical open-bite correction by Le Fort I osteotomy. Angle
6. Brin I, Becker A, Zilberman Y. Resorbed lateral incisors adjacent Orthod. 2000; 70 (2): 112-117.
to impacted canines have normal crown size. Am J Orthod. 19. Park YC, Lee HA, Choi NC, Kim DH. Open bite correction by
1993; 104 (1): 60-66 intrusion of posterior teeth with miniscrews. Angle Orthod. 2008;
7. Copeland S, Green LJ. Root resorption in maxillary central 78 (4): 699-710.
incisors following active orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod. 20. Aras A.Vertical changes following orthodontic extraction
1986; 89 (1): 51-55. treatment in skeletal open bite subjects. Eur J Orthod. 2002; 24
8. Vlaskalic V, Boyd RL. Root resorptions and tissue changes (4): 407-416.
during orthodontic treatment. In: Bishara SE, editor. Textbook of 21. Swinnen K, Politis C, Willems G, De Bruyne I, Fieuws S, Heidbuchel
orthodontics. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2001. p. 463-472. K, van Erum R, Verdonck A, Carels C. Skeletal and dento-alveolar
9. Sarver DM, Weissman, SM. Nonsurgical treatment of open bite stability after surgical-orthodontic treatment of anterior open bite: a
in nongrowing patients. Am J Orthod. 1995; 108 (6): 651-659. retrospective study. Eur J Orthod. 2001; 23 (5): 547-557.
10. Kim YH. Overbite depth indicator: With particular reference to
anterior open bite. American Journal of Orthodontics. 1974; 65:
586-611. Mailing Address:
11. Lieberman MA, Gazit E. Correction of a class i skeletal open-bite Nancy Verdugo Álvarez
malocclusion. Angle Orthod. 1978; 48 (3): 206-209. E-mail: nancyverdugo@live.com

www.medigraphic.org.mx