Jim Kusch
Jim is a curious academician
less
Related Authors
David C . Berliner
Arizona State University
Sterling Hilton
Brigham Young University
Dan Laitsch
Simon Fraser University
Matthew Ohlson, Ph.D.
University of North Florida
Patrik Pluchino
Università degli Studi di Padova
Debra Ackerman
Educational Testing Service
Zoila Tazi
Mercy University
InterestsView All (7)
Uploads
Papers by Jim Kusch
Girne American University TRNC
Abstract
This paper responds to a reality in university language instruction where many, if not a majority of foreign language instructors, are untrained in Foreign or Second Language instruction. In previous research of language instruction, notably in Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) and Task Based Language Teaching (TBLT) methodologies various protocols for organizing content, methods and assessment of language learning emphasize norms and regularities more than the opposite. This paper shows that planning and instruction is transformed by multiple views of teaching, learning and the content of language instruction to create a multifaceted, multi-level classroom within the context of the university. At the heart of the argument is our attempts to teach not only about L2 instruction but also to engage student thinking and imagination that pertains to language learning. Simply stated, students enrol in language classes for a number of reasons and all enrol with an ability to think and perhaps to envision knowing another language. The context that we develop in the second part of this article is shaped by hermeneutics, phenomenology and deconstruction. Ours is not a philosophical piece but it clearly turns on a question of imagination. We discuss in the latter part of the article actual instances from our teaching that involve consciousness and acts of consciousness and extensive classroom discussions of works of writers such as Nessin, Pound, Brecht, Tanpinar and Shakespeare and many others as we encourage student to engage imaginative thinking and inquiry about language.
Girne American University TRNC
Abstract
This paper responds to a reality in university language instruction where many, if not a majority of foreign language instructors, are untrained in Foreign or Second Language instruction. In previous research of language instruction, notably in Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) and Task Based Language Teaching (TBLT) methodologies various protocols for organizing content, methods and assessment of language learning emphasize norms and regularities more than the opposite. This paper shows that planning and instruction is transformed by multiple views of teaching, learning and the content of language instruction to create a multifaceted, multi-level classroom within the context of the university. At the heart of the argument is our attempts to teach not only about L2 instruction but also to engage student thinking and imagination that pertains to language learning. Simply stated, students enrol in language classes for a number of reasons and all enrol with an ability to think and perhaps to envision knowing another language. The context that we develop in the second part of this article is shaped by hermeneutics, phenomenology and deconstruction. Ours is not a philosophical piece but it clearly turns on a question of imagination. We discuss in the latter part of the article actual instances from our teaching that involve consciousness and acts of consciousness and extensive classroom discussions of works of writers such as Nessin, Pound, Brecht, Tanpinar and Shakespeare and many others as we encourage student to engage imaginative thinking and inquiry about language.