Michael Stoto
Related Authors
Andrej Dujella
University of Zagreb
Hemin Koyi
Uppsala University
Jana Javornik
University of East London
Graham Martin
University of Leicester
Gwen Robbins Schug
University of North Carolina at Greensboro
Gabriel Gutierrez-Alonso
University of Salamanca
John Sutton
Macquarie University
Eros Carvalho
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
Kevin Arbuckle
Swansea University
Jesper Hoffmeyer
University of Copenhagen
Uploads
Papers by Michael Stoto
Although informed by public health emergency practitioners, this report is primarily written for educators who will develop competency-based training programmes. It should also be useful for organisations that employ professionals trained in public health emergency preparedness. Public health emergency preparedness is very broad, diverse, and rather complex societal process of preparing and responding to health threats caused by communicable diseases and other cross-border threats to health.
ECDC has initiated a medium-term project aimed at designing competency-based training curricula for experts working in preparedness at the national level in the Member States. ‘Competency-based’ means that training participants acquire knowledge and skills based on a defined set of core competencies they need to best fulfil their job responsibilities. The competency-based approach enhances harmonisation and helps to ensure similar levels of competency throughout the EU, regardless of the background of those working in the field.
These competencies are intended to describe the knowledge and skills needed by experts working in preparedness at the national level such as national preparedness committee members or their equivalent. We recognise that the preparedness and emergency response structures of EU Member States vary, and use the term ‘national preparedness committee’ generically to describe the group of individuals who work on these issues in any given country. In general, however, public health preparedness is included in the emergency management structures in a country, which are usually led by interior affairs or civil protection staff. When an emergency is of a health nature, then health personnel typically take the lead.
While the PHEP logic model and competencies can be useful in preparedness planning, it is not ECDC’s goal to mandate any particular emergency response approach, structure, or capabilities. These are clearly the responsibility of the Member States and necessarily reflect each country’s own resources, administrative and political structures, as well as their responsibilities under Decision 1082 and the International Health Regulations (2005). Similarly, it is not ECDC’s intention to specify the knowledge or skills needed by any particular group of preparedness workers. Rather, our goal is to describe the competencies that different groups of professionals need – in addition to the basic knowledge and skills required for their profession – when they are called upon to serve as members of national preparedness committees or teams in order to facilitate an effective national and cross-border response to health threats in Europe.