Skip to content

separator is no longer forced to the edge #226

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 27, 2015

Conversation

enchev
Copy link
Contributor

@enchev enchev commented May 27, 2015

Use this code in ListView.itemLoading event if you want to control the
inset:

function listViewItemLoading(args) {
if (args.ios) {
   args.ios.separatorInset = UIEdgeInsetsZero;
   args.ios.preservesSuperviewLayoutMargins = false;
   args.ios.layoutMargins = UIEdgeInsetsZero;
 }
}

Use this code in ListView.itemLoading event if you want to control the
inset:

function listViewItemLoading(args) {
if (args.ios) {
args.ios.separatorInset = UIEdgeInsetsZero;
args.ios.preservesSuperviewLayoutMargins = false;
args.ios.layoutMargins = UIEdgeInsetsZero;
}
}
@ns-bot ns-bot added cla: yes and removed cla: no labels May 27, 2015
@ns-bot
Copy link

ns-bot commented May 27, 2015

@nsndeck
Copy link

nsndeck commented May 27, 2015

👍

enchev pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 27, 2015
separator is no longer forced to the edge
@enchev enchev merged commit 20fb94e into master May 27, 2015
@enchev enchev deleted the ListView-ios-separator-width branch May 27, 2015 14:07
@enchev
Copy link
Contributor Author

enchev commented May 27, 2015

Fixed #227.

@lock
Copy link

lock bot commented Aug 29, 2019

This thread has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.

@lock lock bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 29, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants