Skip to content

Correct identifier #151

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 5, 2025
Merged

Correct identifier #151

merged 2 commits into from
Aug 5, 2025

Conversation

sydseter
Copy link
Collaborator

@sydseter sydseter commented Aug 5, 2025

5 has been used for the previous list above.

Copy link
Contributor

@jgadsden jgadsden left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

a good change, thanks @sydseter
As we have the hood up, could we also consider rewording this line 52:

9. Avoid the use of known vulnerable functions (e.g., printf, strcat, strcpy etc.)

to be less C language specific? such as rewording as "9. Avoid the use of known vulnerable functions"

Unless it is only C that has known vulnerable functions, which may be the case

@sydseter sydseter merged commit 0cde6ca into main Aug 5, 2025
4 of 5 checks passed
@sydseter sydseter mentioned this pull request Aug 5, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants