Skip to content

rust: globally warn on unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn #339

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 3, 2021

Conversation

ojeda
Copy link
Member

@ojeda ojeda commented Jun 3, 2021

This includes non-rust/ code.

As soon as the warnings are cleaned up, we can move it to a hard error.

Fixes: #285

Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda ojeda@kernel.org

This includes non-`rust/` code.

As soon as the warnings are cleaned up, we can move it to a hard error.

Fixes: Rust-for-Linux#285

Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
@ksquirrel
Copy link
Member

Review of 34658e643210:

  • ✔️ Commit 34658e6: Looks fine!

@ojeda ojeda merged commit 0b9bcdf into Rust-for-Linux:rust Jun 3, 2021
@ojeda ojeda deleted the unsafe branch June 3, 2021 21:38
@alex
Copy link
Member

alex commented Jun 3, 2021

Let's get a bug to flip it to an error after we've got the warning count to 0.

@ojeda
Copy link
Member Author

ojeda commented Jun 3, 2021

Let's get a bug to flip it to an error after we've got the warning count to 0.

+1 I'm on it.

@TheSven73
Copy link
Collaborator

Was it such a great idea to merge this in its current form? I am getting tons of build warnings now.

@TheSven73
Copy link
Collaborator

warning: 118 warnings emitted
Do we divide up the work between a few volunteers? :)

@nbdd0121
Copy link
Member

nbdd0121 commented Jun 3, 2021

Well, we need to merge it; unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn is not a conventional warnings. If you allow it, it will warn about using unsafe in unsafe fn; otherwise if warns about not using unsafe in unsafe fn.

So if we don't merge this we'll have to use #[allow(unused_unsafe)] while doing migration, which means that we won't have warning for either style :)

@TheSven73
Copy link
Collaborator

Not disputing that we should merge it... just fell off my chair when I saw the gazillion warnings :)

So do we divvy up these 118 warnings between volunteers? I can help if required.

@ojeda
Copy link
Member Author

ojeda commented Jun 3, 2021

Yes please! Follow the discussion in #340.

@ojeda
Copy link
Member Author

ojeda commented Jun 3, 2021

Was it such a great idea to merge this in its current form? I am getting tons of build warnings now.

Like Gary explained, it was either that or adding allow everywhere, which is not nice and would create more churn.

If we were in mainline, I would have gone the other way -- but since it is just "us"... better to push everyone to fix them ;)

Not disputing that we should merge it... just fell off my chair when I saw the gazillion warnings :)

Yeah, that is why I tagged it as prio: high -- hopefully in a week or so we have them sorted out.

Darksonn pushed a commit to Darksonn/linux that referenced this pull request Jan 17, 2025
Using mutex lock in IO hot path causes the kernel BUG sleeping while
atomic. Shinichiro[1], first encountered this issue while running blktest
nvme/052 shown below:

BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/mutex.c:585
in_atomic(): 0, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 996, name: (udev-worker)
preempt_count: 0, expected: 0
RCU nest depth: 1, expected: 0
2 locks held by (udev-worker)/996:
 #0: ffff8881004570c8 (mapping.invalidate_lock){.+.+}-{3:3}, at: page_cache_ra_unbounded+0x155/0x5c0
 Rust-for-Linux#1: ffffffff8607eaa0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: blk_mq_flush_plug_list+0xa75/0x1950
CPU: 2 UID: 0 PID: 996 Comm: (udev-worker) Not tainted 6.12.0-rc3+ Rust-for-Linux#339
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-2.fc40 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 dump_stack_lvl+0x6a/0x90
 __might_resched.cold+0x1f7/0x23d
 ? __pfx___might_resched+0x10/0x10
 ? vsnprintf+0xdeb/0x18f0
 __mutex_lock+0xf4/0x1220
 ? nvmet_subsys_nsid_exists+0xb9/0x150 [nvmet]
 ? __pfx_vsnprintf+0x10/0x10
 ? __pfx___mutex_lock+0x10/0x10
 ? snprintf+0xa5/0xe0
 ? xas_load+0x1ce/0x3f0
 ? nvmet_subsys_nsid_exists+0xb9/0x150 [nvmet]
 nvmet_subsys_nsid_exists+0xb9/0x150 [nvmet]
 ? __pfx_nvmet_subsys_nsid_exists+0x10/0x10 [nvmet]
 nvmet_req_find_ns+0x24e/0x300 [nvmet]
 nvmet_req_init+0x694/0xd40 [nvmet]
 ? blk_mq_start_request+0x11c/0x750
 ? nvme_setup_cmd+0x369/0x990 [nvme_core]
 nvme_loop_queue_rq+0x2a7/0x7a0 [nvme_loop]
 ? __pfx___lock_acquire+0x10/0x10
 ? __pfx_nvme_loop_queue_rq+0x10/0x10 [nvme_loop]
 __blk_mq_issue_directly+0xe2/0x1d0
 ? __pfx___blk_mq_issue_directly+0x10/0x10
 ? blk_mq_request_issue_directly+0xc2/0x140
 blk_mq_plug_issue_direct+0x13f/0x630
 ? lock_acquire+0x2d/0xc0
 ? blk_mq_flush_plug_list+0xa75/0x1950
 blk_mq_flush_plug_list+0xa9d/0x1950
 ? __pfx_blk_mq_flush_plug_list+0x10/0x10
 ? __pfx_mpage_readahead+0x10/0x10
 __blk_flush_plug+0x278/0x4d0
 ? __pfx___blk_flush_plug+0x10/0x10
 ? lock_release+0x460/0x7a0
 blk_finish_plug+0x4e/0x90
 read_pages+0x51b/0xbc0
 ? __pfx_read_pages+0x10/0x10
 ? lock_release+0x460/0x7a0
 page_cache_ra_unbounded+0x326/0x5c0
 force_page_cache_ra+0x1ea/0x2f0
 filemap_get_pages+0x59e/0x17b0
 ? __pfx_filemap_get_pages+0x10/0x10
 ? lock_is_held_type+0xd5/0x130
 ? __pfx___might_resched+0x10/0x10
 ? find_held_lock+0x2d/0x110
 filemap_read+0x317/0xb70
 ? up_write+0x1ba/0x510
 ? __pfx_filemap_read+0x10/0x10
 ? inode_security+0x54/0xf0
 ? selinux_file_permission+0x36d/0x420
 blkdev_read_iter+0x143/0x3b0
 vfs_read+0x6ac/0xa20
 ? __pfx_vfs_read+0x10/0x10
 ? __pfx_vm_mmap_pgoff+0x10/0x10
 ? __pfx___seccomp_filter+0x10/0x10
 ksys_read+0xf7/0x1d0
 ? __pfx_ksys_read+0x10/0x10
 do_syscall_64+0x93/0x180
 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x16d/0x400
 ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180
 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x78/0x100
 ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180
 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x16d/0x400
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
RIP: 0033:0x7f565bd1ce11
Code: 00 48 8b 15 09 90 0d 00 f7 d8 64 89 02 b8 ff ff ff ff eb bd e8 d0 ad 01 00 f3 0f 1e fa 80 3d 35 12 0e 00 00 74 13 31 c0 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 4f c3 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 55 48 89 e5 48 83 ec
RSP: 002b:00007ffd6e7a20c8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000000
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000001000 RCX: 00007f565bd1ce11
RDX: 0000000000001000 RSI: 00007f565babb000 RDI: 0000000000000014
RBP: 00007ffd6e7a2130 R08: 00000000ffffffff R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000556000bfa610 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 000000003ffff000
R13: 0000556000bfa5b0 R14: 0000000000000e00 R15: 0000556000c07328
 </TASK>

Apparently, the above issue is caused due to using mutex lock while
we're in IO hot path. It's a regression caused with commit 5053639
("nvmet: fix nvme status code when namespace is disabled"). The mutex
->su_mutex is used to find whether a disabled nsid exists in the config
group or not. This is to differentiate between a nsid that is disabled
vs non-existent.

To mitigate the above issue, we've worked upon a fix[2] where we now
insert nsid in subsys Xarray as soon as it's created under config group
and later when that nsid is enabled, we add an Xarray mark on it and set
ns->enabled to true. The Xarray mark is useful while we need to loop
through all enabled namepsaces under a subsystem using xa_for_each_marked()
API. If later a nsid is disabled then we clear Xarray mark from it and also
set ns->enabled to false. It's only when nsid is deleted from the config
group we delete it from the Xarray.

So with this change, now we could easily differentiate a nsid is disabled
(i.e. Xarray entry for ns exists but ns->enabled is set to false) vs non-
existent (i.e.Xarray entry for ns doesn't exist).

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nvme/20241022070252.GA11389@lst.de/ [2]
Reported-by: Shinichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nvme/tqcy3sveity7p56v7ywp7ssyviwcb3w4623cnxj3knoobfcanq@yxgt2mjkbkam/ [1]
Fixes: 5053639 ("nvmet: fix nvme status code when namespace is disabled")
Fix-suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Nilay Shroff <nilay@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Consider opting for unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn
5 participants