Skip to content

Conversation

JaeyoungAhn
Copy link
Contributor

#4564 update test_builtin.py from cpython v3.11.2

@DimitrisJim
Copy link
Member

thanks! There's some additional regressions here which should be noted: test_delattr, test_getattr, test_hasattr and test_setattr should probably all be related. test_type_name is also failing now.

Copy link
Member

@DimitrisJim DimitrisJim left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

hopefully should be good to go now.

@DimitrisJim DimitrisJim merged commit cfed9f3 into RustPython:main Mar 25, 2023
@youknowone youknowone added A-design About RustPython's own implementation z-ca-2023 Tag to track contrubution-academy 2023 labels Mar 25, 2023
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ def write(self, line):
('', ValueError),
(' ', ValueError),
(' \t\t ', ValueError),
# (str(br'\u0663\u0661\u0664 ','raw-unicode-escape'), 314), XXX RustPython
(str(br'\u0663\u0661\u0664 ','raw-unicode-escape'), 314),
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@@ -1475,11 +1614,16 @@ def test_bug_27936(self):
self.assertEqual(round(x, None), round(x))
self.assertEqual(type(round(x, None)), type(round(x)))

# TODO: RUSTPYTHON
@unittest.expectedFailure
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

fixing this one is looking like a good first issue

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@DimitrisJim I believe this should have been broken out into a separate commit.

@youknowone youknowone added A-stdlib and removed A-design About RustPython's own implementation labels Mar 25, 2023
Comment on lines +526 to +527
# TODO: RUSTPYTHON
@unittest.expectedFailure
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@DimitrisJim I believe this should have been broken out into a separate commit.

Comment on lines +760 to +761
# TODO: RUSTPYTHON
@unittest.expectedFailure
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@DimitrisJim I believe this should have been broken out into a separate commit.

Comment on lines +794 to +795
# TODO: RUSTPYTHON
@unittest.expectedFailure
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@DimitrisJim I believe this should have been broken out into a separate commit.

Comment on lines +815 to +816
# TODO: RUSTPYTHON
@unittest.expectedFailure
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@DimitrisJim I believe this should have been broken out into a separate commit.

Comment on lines +839 to +840
# TODO: RUSTPYTHON
@unittest.expectedFailure
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@DimitrisJim I believe this should have been broken out into a separate commit.

Comment on lines +950 to +951
# TODO: RUSTPYTHON
@unittest.expectedFailure
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@DimitrisJim I believe this should have been broken out into a separate commit.

Comment on lines +963 to +964
# TODO: RUSTPYTHON
@unittest.expectedFailure
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@DimitrisJim I believe this should have been broken out into a separate commit.

Comment on lines +2413 to +2414
# TODO: RUSTPYTHON
@unittest.expectedFailure
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@DimitrisJim I believe this should have been broken out into a separate commit.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-stdlib z-ca-2023 Tag to track contrubution-academy 2023
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants