You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Thanks for contributing to the Selenium site and documentation! A PR well described will help maintainers to review and merge it quickly
Before submitting your PR, please check our contributing guidelines.
Avoid large PRs, and help reviewers by making them as simple and short as possible.
Description
Motivation and Context
Types of changes
Change to the site (I have double-checked the Netlify deployment, and my changes look good)
Code example added (and I also added the example to all translated languages)
Improved translation
Added new translation (and I also added a notice to each document missing translation)
Code Smell The informationWithElements method is quite long and could be split into smaller, more focused methods for better readability and maintainability.
Possible Bug The checkInput variable is used before it's declared, which might cause a compilation error.
-WebDriver driver = new ChromeDriver();-driver.manage().timeouts().implicitlyWait(Duration.ofMillis(500));-// Navigate to Url-driver.get("https://www.selenium.dev/selenium/web/inputs.html");-...-driver.quit();+try (WebDriver driver = new ChromeDriver()) {+ driver.manage().timeouts().implicitlyWait(Duration.ofMillis(500));+ // Navigate to Url+ driver.get("https://www.selenium.dev/selenium/web/inputs.html");+ ...+ // No need for explicit driver.quit() here+}
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9
Why: This suggestion is a best practice that ensures the WebDriver is closed properly, even if an exception occurs, improving resource management and reliability of the test.
9
Maintainability
Use a constant for the test URL instead of hardcoding it
Consider using a constant or a configuration file for the URL instead of hardcoding it in the test method.
-driver.get("https://www.selenium.dev/selenium/web/inputs.html");+private static final String TEST_URL = "https://www.selenium.dev/selenium/web/inputs.html";+...+driver.get(TEST_URL);
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8
Why: This suggestion improves maintainability by avoiding hardcoded values, making it easier to update the URL in the future if needed.
8
Enhancement
✅ Use assertTrue for boolean assertions instead of assertEquals with trueSuggestion Impact:The commit changed boolean assertions from assertEquals(..., true) to assertTrue(...) for isDisplayed, isEnabled, and isSelected checks.
code diff:
+ // isDisplayed+ // Get boolean value for is element display+ boolean isEmailVisible = driver.findElement(By.name("email_input")).isDisplayed();+ assertTrue(isEmailVisible);- // isEnabled- // Returns true if element is enabled else returns false- boolean isEnabledButton = driver.findElement(By.name("button_input")).isEnabled();- assertEquals(isEnabledButton, true);+ // isEnabled+ // returns true if element is enabled else returns false+ boolean isEnabledButton = driver.findElement(By.name("button_input")).isEnabled();+ assertTrue(isEnabledButton);- // isSelected- // Returns true if element is checked else returns false- boolean isSelectedCheck = driver.findElement(By.name("checkbox_input")).isSelected();- assertEquals(isSelectedCheck, true);+ // isSelected+ // returns true if element is checked else returns false+ boolean isSelectedCheck = driver.findElement(By.name("checkbox_input")).isSelected();+ assertTrue(isSelectedCheck);
Replace the boolean literal true with the actual boolean value in the assertions to improve readability and make the test more self-explanatory.
Why: Using assertTrue improves readability and makes the test more self-explanatory, which is a good enhancement for code clarity.
7
Use assertFalse for boolean assertions instead of assertEquals with false
Consider using JUnit's assertFalse method instead of assertEquals when checking if a boolean value is false. This improves readability and provides a more specific assertion.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
User description
In two files fixed typos and refactor the files.
Fixes #1
Thanks for contributing to the Selenium site and documentation!
A PR well described will help maintainers to review and merge it quickly
Before submitting your PR, please check our contributing guidelines.
Avoid large PRs, and help reviewers by making them as simple and short as possible.
Description
Motivation and Context
Types of changes
Checklist
PR Type
enhancement
Description
InformationTest.javaandInteractionTest.javato improve code readability and consistency.Changes walkthrough 📝
InformationTest.java
Refactor and improve readability of InformationTest.javaexamples/java/src/test/java/dev/selenium/elements/InformationTest.java
InteractionTest.java
Refactor and improve readability of InteractionTest.javaexamples/java/src/test/java/dev/selenium/elements/InteractionTest.java