Skip to content

Add juggler sequence implementation #2845

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 26, 2021
Merged

Add juggler sequence implementation #2845

merged 3 commits into from
Nov 26, 2021

Conversation

itsAkshayDubey
Copy link
Contributor

Describe your change:

  • Add an algorithm?
  • Fix a bug or typo in an existing algorithm?
  • Documentation change?

References

#2841 Juggler Sequence Implementation

Checklist:

  • I have read CONTRIBUTING.md.
  • This pull request is all my own work -- I have not plagiarized.
  • I know that pull requests will not be merged if they fail the automated tests.
  • This PR only changes one algorithm file. To ease review, please open separate PRs for separate algorithms.
  • All new Java files are placed inside an existing directory.
  • All filenames are in all uppercase characters with no spaces or dashes.
  • All functions and variable names follow Java naming conventions.
  • All new algorithms have a URL in its comments that points to Wikipedia or other similar explanation.
  • If this pull request resolves one or more open issues then the commit message contains Fixes: #{$ISSUE_NO}.

Copy link
Member

@siriak siriak left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks!

@siriak siriak merged commit 2954ed2 into TheAlgorithms:master Nov 26, 2021
@yanglbme
Copy link
Member

I think the code should be formatted before merging into master branch.

@yanglbme yanglbme mentioned this pull request Nov 27, 2021
12 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants