Skip to content

style: include PCOA_PARTIALLY_CONSTRUCTED_OBJECT_ACCESS #6133

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

vil02
Copy link
Member

@vil02 vil02 commented Jan 13, 2025

Continuation of #5126.

  • I have read CONTRIBUTING.md.
  • This pull request is all my own work -- I have not plagiarized it.
  • All filenames are in PascalCase.
  • All functions and variable names follow Java naming conventions.
  • All new algorithms have a URL in their comments that points to Wikipedia or other similar explanations.
  • All new code is formatted with clang-format -i --style=file path/to/your/file.java

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 73.76%. Comparing base (779381f) to head (ed31f86).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master    #6133   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     73.76%   73.76%           
- Complexity     5120     5121    +1     
=========================================
  Files           658      658           
  Lines         17620    17621    +1     
  Branches       3391     3390    -1     
=========================================
+ Hits          12997    12998    +1     
  Misses         4118     4118           
  Partials        505      505           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@vil02 vil02 marked this pull request as ready for review January 13, 2025 16:51
@siriak siriak merged commit 39122a9 into TheAlgorithms:master Jan 13, 2025
6 checks passed
@vil02 vil02 deleted the include_PCOA_PARTIALLY_CONSTRUCTED_OBJECT_ACCESS branch January 13, 2025 17:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants