style: apply clang-format per CI

TheAlgorithms · Leogricci · Aug 29, 2025 · Aug 29, 2025 · Aug 29, 2025 · Aug 29, 2025
commit e21a21fa669430d4ab34a20512a960430f99e4f8
@@ -97,19 +97,19 @@ private <T extends Comparable<T>> T[] concatenateBuckets(Iterable<List<T>> bucke
      *
      *<p><b>Important limitations:</b>
      *<ul>
-	 *   <li>This method uses {@code compareTo} as if it provided a numeric difference. 
-	 *   For numeric types, {@code compareTo} only reports order (−1, 0, 1), not the actual distance. 
-	 *   This often collapses distribution into one or two buckets.</li>
-	 *   <li>For non-numeric {@code Comparable} types (for example {@code String}), bucket indices depend on lexicographic 
-	 *   code-point differences, which are not a proportional measure of spacing. Distribution is therefore arbitrary and uneven.</li>
-	 *   <li>If {@code min.equals(max)}, the computed "range" is 0. Then {@code element.compareTo(min) / 0} 
-	 *   yields {@code NaN}, which Java coerces to 0 when cast to {@code int}. 
-	 *   Practically, all elements collapse into bucket 0 in this case.</li>
-	 * </ul>
-	 *
-	 * <p>Despite these limitations, the sort remains correct because each bucket is sorted internally and concatenated. 
-	 * This method should be regarded as a simplified demonstration rather than a
-	 * general-purpose bucketing strategy for arbitrary {@code Comparable<T>} values.</p>
+     *   <li>This method uses {@code compareTo} as if it provided a numeric difference.
+     *   For numeric types, {@code compareTo} only reports order (−1, 0, 1), not the actual distance.
+     *   This often collapses distribution into one or two buckets.</li>
+     *   <li>For non-numeric {@code Comparable} types (for example {@code String}), bucket indices depend on lexicographic
+     *   code-point differences, which are not a proportional measure of spacing. Distribution is therefore arbitrary and uneven.</li>
+     *   <li>If {@code min.equals(max)}, the computed "range" is 0. Then {@code element.compareTo(min) / 0}
+     *   yields {@code NaN}, which Java coerces to 0 when cast to {@code int}.
+     *   Practically, all elements collapse into bucket 0 in this case.</li>
+     * </ul>
+     *
+     * <p>Despite these limitations, the sort remains correct because each bucket is sorted internally and concatenated.
+     * This method should be regarded as a simplified demonstration rather than a
+     * general-purpose bucketing strategy for arbitrary {@code Comparable<T>} values.</p>
      *
      * @param element the element of the array
      * @param min the minimum value in the array

@@ -9,29 +9,29 @@
 public class BucketSortHashBehaviorTest {
 
     private static <T extends Comparable<T>> int pseudoHash(final T element, final T min, final T max, final int numberOfBuckets) {
-        //Reproduces the production hash() logic
+        // Reproduces the production hash() logic
         double range = max.compareTo(min);
         double normalizedValue = element.compareTo(min) / range; // -1/0/1 divided by -1/0/1
         return (int) (normalizedValue * (numberOfBuckets - 1));
     }
 
-    @Test //Test case when all numbers are equal
+    @Test // Test case when all numbers are equal
     void sort_stillCorrect_whenAllEqual() {
         Integer[] arr = {1, 1, 1, 1, 1};
         Integer[] expected = arr.clone();
 
         new BucketSort().sort(arr);
         assertArrayEquals(expected, arr);
 
-        //Observe bucket mapping (all collapse to index 0)
+        // Observe bucket mapping (all collapse to index 0)
         Integer min = 1, max = 1;
         int numberOfBuckets = Math.max(arr.length / 10, 1); // same as BUCKET_DIVISOR rule
         int idx = pseudoHash(1, min, max, numberOfBuckets);
-        //idx will be 0 because NaN cast to int -> 0 in Java
+        // idx will be 0 because NaN cast to int -> 0 in Java
         System.out.println("All-equal case -> bucket index: " + idx);
     }
 
-    @Test //Test case with non-equal integers
+    @Test // Test case with non-equal integers
     void sort_stillCorrect_nonEqualIntegers() {
         Integer[] arr = {20, 40, 30, 10};
         Integer[] expected = {10, 20, 30, 40};
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ void sort_stillCorrect_nonEqualIntegers() {
         // Expect only two distinct buckets because compareTo gives -1/0/1
     }
 
-    @Test //Test case when the Array contains Strings
+    @Test // Test case when the Array contains Strings
     void sort_stillCorrect_whenStrings() {
         String[] arr = {"apple", "banana", "carrot"};
         String[] expected = arr.clone();
@@ -70,4 +70,3 @@ void sort_stillCorrect_whenStrings() {
         // Buckets reflect only lexicographic order, not a numeric spacing
     }
 }
-