Skip to content

Conversation

michaek
Copy link

@michaek michaek commented Dec 23, 2011

See: #880

This includes the commit from #877 because the test here depends on the unit test setup for the has_many method.

This can still use some front-end treatment, as it's pretty much an invisible feature at the moment.

@jpmckinney
Copy link
Contributor

Related #1512

@coodix
Copy link

coodix commented Dec 9, 2012

+1

@seanlinsley
Copy link
Contributor

Please rebase these changes on master:

# Expectations: "upstream" is gregbell's GitHub repo and "origin" is your fork

# Rebase your fork's master branch with the latest upstream changes
git checkout master
git pull --rebase upstream master
git push origin master

# Rebase your feature branch with the latest upstream changes
git checkout your_feature_branch
git pull --rebase upstream master
git push origin your_feature_branch # note that you may need to use -f

@seanlinsley
Copy link
Contributor

Replaced by #2117

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants