Skip to content

Look for additional lib suffix with oneMKL #3120

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 29, 2021
Merged

Conversation

9prady9
Copy link
Member

@9prady9 9prady9 commented Apr 9, 2021

Description

It seems like current installation of oneMKL has the symlinks missing or may be they are not included. Either way, current FindMKL module cannot locate them without this change.

Also Fixes #3116

Changes to Users

None

Checklist

  • Rebased on latest master
  • Code compiles
  • Tests pass
  • [ ] Functions added to unified API
  • [ ] Functions documented

@9prady9 9prady9 added this to the 3.8.1 milestone Apr 9, 2021
@9prady9 9prady9 requested a review from umar456 April 9, 2021 05:42
Using single dynamic library instead of the tuple of interface,
threading-layer & core libraries removes the linking issues in unified
backend library. This further removes issues from wrappers that use
unified backend when loading Intel MKL libraries at runtime.

With this change, we also package mkl_rt single dynamic library along
with all other required libraries.
@9prady9 9prady9 merged commit 56f7b1f into arrayfire:master Apr 29, 2021
@9prady9 9prady9 deleted the onemkl branch April 29, 2021 17:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[BUG] arrayfire-cpu3-mkl and arrayfire-opencl3-mkl are broken on Ubuntu 20.04
2 participants