Skip to content

Refactor init module #242

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 13, 2020
Merged

Refactor init module #242

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 13, 2020

Conversation

roaffix
Copy link
Contributor

@roaffix roaffix commented Nov 13, 2020 •
edited
Loading

  • Init module refactoring to fit cupy. The idea was discussed with @syurkevi. The main goal of these changes is to simplify the maintenance of the numpy-alike interface of arrayfire-python lib.

@roaffix roaffix force-pushed the fix/remove-camel-case-from-functions branch 4 times, most recently from b59800c to 950c82e Compare November 13, 2020 22:45
@roaffix roaffix changed the title Remove camel case from functions. Refactor init module Refactor init module Nov 13, 2020
@roaffix roaffix force-pushed the fix/remove-camel-case-from-functions branch from 950c82e to caf8630 Compare November 13, 2020 22:51
@syurkevi
Copy link
Contributor

Missing minfilt() and anyTrueByKey()

@roaffix roaffix force-pushed the fix/remove-camel-case-from-functions branch 2 times, most recently from dc93a7f to 6132700 Compare November 13, 2020 23:18
@roaffix roaffix force-pushed the fix/remove-camel-case-from-functions branch from 6132700 to 220a4ad Compare November 13, 2020 23:22
@syurkevi syurkevi merged commit bd7cc8a into arrayfire:dev Nov 13, 2020
@9prady9
Copy link
Member

9prady9 commented Nov 14, 2020 •
edited
Loading

@syurkevi Is the target branch a mistake ? I don't see any PRs merged into dev earlier ?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@roaffix @syurkevi @9prady9