The original version was a little confusing because it was repetitive and missed the opportunity to make clear at the outset that there are potentially 3 SCSS files and they must be imported in order.

Describe the PR

Simplify the documentation making clear the importance of the order, and exactly how to import

PR checklist

What kind of change does this PR introduce? (check at least one)

• Bugfix (fixes a boo-boo in the code) - fix(...), requires a patch version update
• Feature (adds a new feature to BootstrapVue) - feat(...), requires a minor version update
• Enhancement (augments an existing feature) - feat(...), requires a minor version update
• ARIA accessibility (fixes or improves ARIA accessibility) - fix(...), requires a patch or minor version update
• Documentation update (improves documentation or typo fixes) - chore(docs), requires a patch version update
• Other (please describe)

Does this PR introduce a breaking change? (check one)

• No
• Yes (please describe since breaking changes require a minor version update)

The PR fulfills these requirements:

• It's submitted to the dev branch, not the master branch
• [ ] When resolving a specific issue, it's referenced in the PR's title (i.e. [...] (fixes #xxx[,#xxx]), where "xxx" is the issue number)
• It should address only one issue or feature. If adding multiple features or fixing a bug and adding a new feature, break them into separate PRs if at all possible.
• The title should follow the Conventional Commits naming convention (i.e. fix(alert): not alerting during SSR render, docs(badge): update pill examples, chore(docs): fix typo in README, etc.). This is very important, as the CHANGELOG is generated from these messages, and determines the next version type (patch or minor).