-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
[BugFix] Error in reader iter and benchmark #42
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @haochengxia, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
I've addressed a bug in the read_one_req
function's Python binding to ensure it correctly handles non-zero return values, which signify read failures or the end of a trace. Concurrently, I've introduced a new, comprehensive Python benchmarking script for cache simulation. This script allows for performance comparisons between native C, C++-bound Python, and pure Python loop implementations. To support these changes, I've also updated the install script to facilitate building with optional dependencies and running associated tests.
Highlights
- Bug Fix in
read_one_req
Python Binding: I've modified the Python binding forread_one_req
insrc/export_reader.cpp
. Previously, it would throw a runtime error ifread_one_req
returned a non-zero value. Now, it simply returns the non-zero value, allowing the Python side to correctly interpret read failures or the end of the trace without an exception. - New Cache Simulation Benchmarking Script: I've introduced a new, comprehensive Python script at
benchmark/simulation.py
. This script is designed to benchmark cache simulation performance across different implementations: the native C binary, the Pythonc_process_trace
method (which leverages C++ bindings), and a pure Python loop. It provides detailed statistics on execution time, memory usage, and miss ratios, and can generate visualizations and export results to CSV. - Enhanced Install Script with Optional Dependencies: The
scripts/install.sh
has been updated to include a new--all
option. This enhancement allows users to build Python wheels with optional cache eviction algorithms (LRB, GLCACHE, 3L_CACHE) enabled. Additionally, when this option is used, the script will now run specific 'optional' pytest tests relevant to these new algorithms.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command>
or @gemini-code-assist <command>
. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
Feature | Command | Description |
---|---|---|
Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/
folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments or fill out our survey to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request addresses an issue with the trace reader iterator and introduces a comprehensive benchmark script. The change in src/export_reader.cpp
correctly modifies the read_one_req
wrapper to return the status code, which is necessary for the Python iterator protocol. The new benchmark script in benchmark/simulation.py
is a great addition, providing detailed performance analysis and visualizations. However, I've identified a few areas for improvement in the benchmark script, including an incorrect memory measurement methodology for the native C binary, a broad exception handler, and the use of global variables. Additionally, the scripts/install.sh
changes have a misleading help message for the new option and a brittle conditional check. My review provides specific feedback and suggestions to enhance the robustness and clarity of these new additions.
Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
read_one_req
function return non-zero when read fails/reaches the tail