-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Reverted PR #7814 & minor code improvement #9494
Conversation
@auvipy can you review this PR ? |
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #9494 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 78.24% 78.24% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 153 153
Lines 19041 19050 +9
Branches 2520 2520
==========================================
+ Hits 14899 14905 +6
- Misses 3856 3859 +3
Partials 286 286
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lets wait until our CI is stable
Ok . Thanks . |
our CI is stable now, so lets see |
Thanks |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
can you please fix the lint errors and improve test coverage as well? lint error fixing is a must
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Changing to draft until the CI fully passes
@auvipy I think you can review now ! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you please rename the PR?
Also - this is just a pure git revert right? Or are there any manual modifications?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@MehrazRumman can you improve the test coverage please?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
the code looks much better now. also thanks for the additional test cases. the smoke test failure seems to be unrelated to this PR. which is a timeout error
PR #7814 Reverted .