-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 886
Rich parameters: ability to specify order of fields in UI #6362
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
Is there a work around to order input parameters. It almost seems completely random. I can't seem to even trick it so they're alphabetical. E.g. Why would
|
I agree with @dcarrion87. I tried changing the order by renaming but it didn't work. By default they seem alphabetical. |
I spent some time chasing a bug around rich parameters, and I have a feeling that the order can be random sometimes. I think that we should try to keep the order of fields as they appear in the file. @bpmct Do you think that I can pull it into this week's sprint? |
Agreed, let’s do it :) |
I'm going with this issue. |
I merged the PR to order fields alphabetically. I will spend some time to see if we can "pull" the order form |
Currently, rich parameters defined in the TF templates appear to be presented in alphabetical order by name. It would be useful to have an "ordinal" field or other mechanism to influence the ordering of fields.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: