Skip to content

Improve legal protections around dormancy #8987

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
ammario opened this issue Aug 8, 2023 · 3 comments
Closed

Improve legal protections around dormancy #8987

ammario opened this issue Aug 8, 2023 · 3 comments
Assignees
@mtojek
Labels
enterprise Enterprise-license / premium functionality

Comments

@ammario
Copy link
Member

ammario commented Aug 8, 2023 •
edited by bpmct
Loading

Pathologically, someone could edit the dormancy code to 1 day to avoid paying us fairly.

  • We should change our standard enterprise license to be based on active users in the trailing 90 days, so it's decoupled from the code.
  • We should move dormancy into enterprise/ folder

From @bpmct

  • Document our dormancy feature and its rationale
@ammario ammario added feature enterprise Enterprise-license / premium functionality labels Aug 8, 2023
@ammario ammario mentioned this issue Aug 8, 2023
Closed
@bpmct bpmct added the must-do Issues that must be completed by the end of the Sprint. Or else. Only humans may set this. label Aug 15, 2023
@ammario ammario removed the must-do Issues that must be completed by the end of the Sprint. Or else. Only humans may set this. label Aug 18, 2023
@mtojek mtojek self-assigned this Aug 21, 2023
@mtojek
Copy link
Member

mtojek commented Aug 31, 2023

I'm taking a look at this now.

We should move dormancy into enterprise/ folder

will do 👍

Document our dormancy feature and its rationale

@bpmct We have user status documented here. Do we want a separate section for account dormancy or did you mean something else?

We should change our standard enterprise license to be based on active users in the trailing 90 days, so it's decoupled from the code.

@ammario I'm not sure if I fully understand. Do you want to rephrase LICENSE.enterprise, and add definitions for active users and dormancy?

@mtojek mtojek mentioned this issue Aug 31, 2023
Merged
@bpmct
Copy link
Member

bpmct commented Aug 31, 2023 •
edited
Loading

I think our current docs are fine. I'm not sure what else we can put at this point. I think I didn't know of them

@ammario
Copy link
Member Author

ammario commented Aug 31, 2023

Yeah, since the code is in enterprise I think we're good.

@ammario ammario closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Aug 31, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@mtojek mtojek

Labels
enterprise Enterprise-license / premium functionality
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@ammario @mtojek @bpmct