-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 888
processes running on ports not showing up in Ports
but are available
#9074
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
@BrunoQuaresma found the bug of sorts. You have to refresh the UI for the ports to show up. |
@sharkymark I guess it might be related to #8834. |
Maybe this happens when we try to fetch the ports and the agent is not ready? Or the process that identifies the ports is not ready? cc.: @deansheather do you think this makes sense? |
I think it's something a little nastier than that. Even after plenty of time for things to settle, I can refresh the page and only ever see half of the ports being forwarded. |
@aslilac yes, we are not able to automatically find all the ports. @deansheather has more context on that I guess. |
@BrunoQuaresma should we add a little warning that the list may not be exhaustive? or is the goal to make it exhaustive? |
I think Dean and @bpmct have more context. |
Related: #9135 |
Can you please provide the output of |
Actually since these are both on workspace proxy enabled deployments I think this is caused by #8909. |
@sharkymark, do you still have this? If not let us close this as completed. |
Version:
v2.0.2+76ad116
My template's
startup_script
starts an NGINX web server withdocker run
on8080
and another process is a Python web server on8000
They should be listed like in previous versions of Coder.
Both do not show up in the
Ports
UI but I cancurl
them or manually enter the port in the Ports UI.@BrunoQuaresma
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: