I think could be interesting to add a column "status" as we have on the users' page.

I'm of the opinion that we should do the opposite: we shouldn't allow adding dormant or suspended users to groups. Thoughts?

@sreya I think it is ok but we still have to deal with the case where users can be added to the group and be set as dormant or suspended after.

@sreya @BrunoQuaresma If we didn't allow adding them to groups, we'd have to figure out what to do with users who have been previously added to groups and then become dormant or suspended, which, IMO, may unnecessarily complicate things. Do we have a good reason to not want them added? I can add a status column to make their inactive status more apparent as per Bruno's suggestion if that makes their presence more tolerable.

Yeah I guess I was thinking we just wouldn't return suspended or dormant users. Dormant users don't count against the license count so it's almost like they don't "exist". But I'm fine with Bruno's suggestion of labeling them if they aren't active.

@sreya sounds good. I could even see someone wanting to make a group of all dormant users for licensing purposes.