Skip to content

chore: add database test fixture to insert non-unique linked_ids #12111

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Feb 13, 2024
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
-- This is a deleted user that shares the same username and linked_id as the existing user below.
-- Any future migrations need to handle this case.
INSERT INTO public.users(id, email, username, hashed_password, created_at, updated_at, status, rbac_roles, deleted)
VALUES ('a0061a8e-7db7-4585-838c-3116a003dd21', 'githubuser@coder.com', 'githubuser', '\x', '2022-11-02 13:05:21.445455+02', '2022-11-02 13:05:21.445455+02', 'active', '{}', true) ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING;
INSERT INTO public.organization_members VALUES ('a0061a8e-7db7-4585-838c-3116a003dd21', 'bb640d07-ca8a-4869-b6bc-ae61ebb2fda1', '2022-11-02 13:05:21.447595+02', '2022-11-02 13:05:21.447595+02', '{}') ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING;
INSERT INTO public.user_links(user_id, login_type, linked_id, oauth_access_token)
VALUES('a0061a8e-7db7-4585-838c-3116a003dd21', 'github', '100', '');
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Will this trigger potential issues even with an empty token?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nah. If it does, that would be quite interesting.

It's in a fixture, so this never touches anything in a production environment.



INSERT INTO public.users(id, email, username, hashed_password, created_at, updated_at, status, rbac_roles, deleted)
VALUES ('fc1511ef-4fcf-4a3b-98a1-8df64160e35a', 'githubuser@coder.com', 'githubuser', '\x', '2022-11-02 13:05:21.445455+02', '2022-11-02 13:05:21.445455+02', 'active', '{}', false) ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING;
INSERT INTO public.organization_members VALUES ('fc1511ef-4fcf-4a3b-98a1-8df64160e35a', 'bb640d07-ca8a-4869-b6bc-ae61ebb2fda1', '2022-11-02 13:05:21.447595+02', '2022-11-02 13:05:21.447595+02', '{}') ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING;
INSERT INTO public.user_links(user_id, login_type, linked_id, oauth_access_token)
VALUES('fc1511ef-4fcf-4a3b-98a1-8df64160e35a', 'github', '100', '');

-- Additionally, there is no unique constraint on user_id. So also add another user_link for the same user.
-- This has happened on a production database.
INSERT INTO public.user_links(user_id, login_type, linked_id, oauth_access_token)
VALUES('fc1511ef-4fcf-4a3b-98a1-8df64160e35a', 'oidc', 'foo', '');