Skip to content

feat: support custom validation errors for number-typed parameters #12224

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Feb 20, 2024
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Prev Previous commit
Next Next commit
test
  • Loading branch information
mtojek committed Feb 20, 2024
commit 0e1f35c80a3fff610db856cc7b65f30654d4b5f5
21 changes: 21 additions & 0 deletions codersdk/richparameters_test.go
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -376,3 +376,24 @@ func TestParameterResolver_ValidateResolve_Ephemeral_UseEmptyDefault(t *testing.
require.NoError(t, err)
require.Equal(t, "", v)
}

func TestParameterResolver_ValidateResolve_Number_CustomError(t *testing.T) {
t.Parallel()
uut := codersdk.ParameterResolver{}
p := codersdk.TemplateVersionParameter{
Name: "n",
Type: "number",
Mutable: true,
DefaultValue: "5",

ValidationMin: ptr.Ref(int32(4)),
ValidationMax: ptr.Ref(int32(6)),
ValidationError: "These are values for testing purposes: {min}, {max}, and {value}.",
}
_, err := uut.ValidateResolve(p, &codersdk.WorkspaceBuildParameter{
Name: "n",
Value: "8",
})
require.Error(t, err)
require.Contains(t, err.Error(), "These are values for testing purposes: 4, 6, and 8.")
}