-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 887
feat: show summary if unable to edit org #14214
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
🤖 Meticulous spotted visual differences in 16 of 1313 screens tested: view and approve differences detected. Last updated for commit 920b210. This comment will update as new commits are pushed. |
ae276c4
to
9099d34
Compare
9099d34
to
933f61f
Compare
933f61f
to
365bc1d
Compare
site/src/pages/ManagementSettingsPage/OrganizationSettingsPage.test.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
site/src/pages/ManagementSettingsPage/OrganizationSummaryPageView.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
1b43214
to
84176cd
Compare
site/src/pages/ManagementSettingsPage/OrganizationSettingsPage.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
oh, is graphite having some issue with stacking? just noticed all the merge conflict warnings, so my comments are probably out of date |
This can happen if you can edit the members, for example, but not the organization settings. In this case you will see a new summary page instead of the edit form.
84176cd
to
7f520e7
Compare
Oh yeah sorry about that, I am not using Graphite so I had not pushed up a rebase yet. Sorry for the noise |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
rad! lmk if you want more help setting up the storybook stuff. otherwise looks good.
214c5f7
to
e3ac9a2
Compare
e3ac9a2
to
920b210
Compare
This can happen if you can edit the members, for example, but not the organization settings. In this case you will see a new summary page instead of the edit form.
Stacked on #14193
It looks kinda lame, honestly, but probably less bad than an ineditable form, I think. Happy to take this in a different direction if we have some nicer-looking ideas.