Skip to content

feat: group provisioners by authentication method #14580

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Sep 17, 2024
Merged

Conversation

aslilac
Copy link
Member

@aslilac aslilac commented Sep 5, 2024

Closes #14459

Screenshot 2024-09-06 at 11 48 58 AM

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale This issue is like stale bread. label Sep 14, 2024
@aslilac aslilac removed the stale This issue is like stale bread. label Sep 16, 2024
@aslilac aslilac marked this pull request as ready for review September 17, 2024 17:23
Copy link
Member

@Parkreiner Parkreiner left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So far so good! The UI looks really nice

I can go ahead and approve this now. Would you prefer that I do that, or wait until I get through all the other PRs first?

type,
provisioners,
}) => {
const [provisioner] = provisioners;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should there be a check to make sure that the provisioners array isn't empty, or is that basically guaranteed not to happen?

If there are multiple provisioners, is there anything implied by the order they appear in? As in, is the first provisioner always the "main" one?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

currently, it should never be passed an empty provisioners array, but I'm gonna refactor this to make it nicer.

Copy link
Member

@Parkreiner Parkreiner left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Going to go ahead and approve

@aslilac aslilac merged commit dda6bdc into main Sep 17, 2024
30 checks passed
@aslilac aslilac deleted the group-provisioners branch September 17, 2024 20:47
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 17, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

ui(provisioners): group provisioners by authentication method
2 participants