Skip to content

ci: integrate cherry-pick-bot #15973

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 4, 2025
Merged

ci: integrate cherry-pick-bot #15973

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 4, 2025

Conversation

matifali
Copy link
Member

@matifali matifali commented Dec 30, 2024

Integrates cherry-pick-bot to automate cheery picks to release branches.

This works by commenting

/cherry-pick release/2.XX

On any Merged or Open PR and this will automatically open the cheery-pick PR.

  • Install the bot to coder/coder repo.

cc: @kylecarbs , @ammario and @sreya for installing the bot.

Some popular repos making use of this:

  1. https://github.com/zed-industries/zed
  2. https://github.com/flutter/flutter
  3. https://github.com/argoproj/argo-cd
  4. https://github.com/runatlantis/atlantis
  5. https://github.com/flutter/engine

Integrates [`cherry-pick-bot`](https://github.com/googleapis/repo-automation-bots/tree/main/packages/cherry-pick-bot) to automate cheery picks to release branches. 

This works by commenting 

```
/cherry-pick target-branch-name
```
On any Closed to Opened PR and automatically opens the cheery-pick PR.
Copy link
Contributor

@spikecurtis spikecurtis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks useful.

@matifali matifali merged commit 8f570d6 into main Jan 4, 2025
41 checks passed
@matifali matifali deleted the atif/ci-automate-cherry-picks branch January 4, 2025 04:13
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 4, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants