Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
chore: add x-authz-checks debug header when running in dev mode #16873
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore: add x-authz-checks debug header when running in dev mode #16873
Changes from 1 commit
038ad91
132ed27
93826da
3d16842
d59ecbe
fe0e466
f268227
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I know this probably shouldn't happen in the real world, but what if the first authz check returns true, and a subsequent authz check for the same subject, action, and object returns false? I think this would be a really good opportunity to catch something like this and make a lot of confused and angry noises.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
maybe I should just use a slice so that duplicates get recorded
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ooh, a slice would also show you how many times a particular authz check gets done. Maybe a
map[string]int
to count frequencies? That would make it easier to read?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
map[string]int
doesn't leave room to store thebool
. now that I'm thinking about it, a slice is also nice because it guarantees that order is preserved, which is probably a good thing.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's a good point actually! You can then reason about the order of the checks. 🧠