Skip to content

fix: add continue-on-error to SBOM generation and force flag to cosign clean #17288

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

ThomasK33
Copy link
Member

@ThomasK33 ThomasK33 commented Apr 8, 2025

This PR makes the SBOM generation and attestation process more resilient by:

  1. Adding continue-on-error: true to the SBOM generation steps in both CI and release workflows
  2. Adding --force=true flag to all cosign clean commands to ensure they don't fail if in a non-interactive shell (which is the case for CI)

Change-Id: Ide303c059b1a3d0e3fd77863310e99668325bc69
Signed-off-by: Thomas Kosiewski tk@coder.com

@ThomasK33 ThomasK33 requested a review from matifali April 8, 2025 08:09
@ThomasK33 ThomasK33 self-assigned this Apr 8, 2025
Copy link
Member Author

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

@ThomasK33 ThomasK33 marked this pull request as ready for review April 8, 2025 08:09
…n clean

Change-Id: Ide303c059b1a3d0e3fd77863310e99668325bc69
Signed-off-by: Thomas Kosiewski <tk@coder.com>
@ThomasK33 ThomasK33 force-pushed the thomask33/04-08-fix_add_continue-on-error_to_sbom_generation_and_force_flag_to_cosign_clean branch from 7824a2f to a1c73a4 Compare April 8, 2025 08:15
@ThomasK33 ThomasK33 merged commit abe3ad6 into main Apr 8, 2025
38 checks passed
@ThomasK33 ThomasK33 deleted the thomask33/04-08-fix_add_continue-on-error_to_sbom_generation_and_force_flag_to_cosign_clean branch April 8, 2025 08:29
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 8, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants