Skip to content

docs: add cloud-specific database instance recommendations #18862

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jul 15, 2025

Conversation

blink-so[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@blink-so blink-so bot commented Jul 14, 2025

Enhances the Performance efficiency section in the validated architectures documentation with specific instance type recommendations for AWS, Azure, and GCP.

Changes:

  • Added recommended instance types for small, medium, and large deployments across all three major cloud providers
  • Included guidance on avoiding burstable instances (t-family, B-series) for production workloads
  • Added note about CPU baseline limitations for burstable instances

This addresses customer questions about appropriate database instance sizing.

blink-so bot and others added 3 commits July 14, 2025 16:52
Enhances the Performance efficiency section with specific instance type
recommendations for AWS, Azure, and GCP. Includes guidance on avoiding
burstable instances for production workloads.

Co-authored-by: dannykopping <373762+dannykopping@users.noreply.github.com>
Converts bold text to proper headings and adds blank lines around lists
to comply with markdownlint rules.

Co-authored-by: dannykopping <373762+dannykopping@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Danny Kopping <dannykopping@gmail.com>
Copy link
Member

@ThomasK33 ThomasK33 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The AWS docs look fine. I can't tell about Azure and GCP; I haven't worked with them enough to know.

Copy link
Member

@ericpaulsen ericpaulsen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks @dannykopping

@ericpaulsen
Copy link
Member

i've used the Azure & GCP bits - i'm good with them, and they are in line with their AWS equivalents in terms of CPU/mem

@ericpaulsen ericpaulsen merged commit 87e5365 into main Jul 15, 2025
30 checks passed
@ericpaulsen ericpaulsen deleted the enhance-db-instance-recommendations branch July 15, 2025 08:53
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 15, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants