Skip to content

Conversation

BrunoQuaresma
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@BrunoQuaresma BrunoQuaresma self-assigned this Sep 27, 2022
@BrunoQuaresma BrunoQuaresma requested a review from a team as a code owner September 27, 2022 20:05
@BrunoQuaresma BrunoQuaresma requested review from presleyp and jsjoeio and removed request for a team September 27, 2022 20:05
@@ -136,8 +134,7 @@
"typescript": "4.8.2",
"webpack": "5.74.0",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we use Vite for production too?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, but I have to run some experiments to check the build and build size.

Copy link
Contributor

@jsjoeio jsjoeio left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Long live Vite!

Comment on lines 135 to 136
"webpack": "5.74.0",
"webpack-bundle-analyzer": "4.6.1",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we still need these?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It is kinda used to analyze the build, but I don't think we use this anywhere I will remove this after just for caution.

@BrunoQuaresma BrunoQuaresma merged commit 59cc4a2 into main Sep 28, 2022
@BrunoQuaresma BrunoQuaresma deleted the bq/use-vite-on-dev branch September 28, 2022 00:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants