-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 887
feat: improve RBAC preconditions for Insights endpoint #8794
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
23c61c7
WIP
mtojek 5a8e4fb
Merge branch 'main' into 8763-insights-rbac
mtojek 9c88628
WIP
mtojek d2cc0ff
ACL
mtojek 08f243d
User latency tests
mtojek 8c5a834
withTemplate
mtojek 39d691c
withTemplate 2
mtojek a5e01a8
Address PR comments
mtojek File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This doesn't align with our documented permissions here.
Is the reason for making the required permission "update" to ensure that only template owners can view template insights? If so, we should make a separate
TemplateInsights
resource and make appropriate modifications to our built-in roles.Otherwise, why not just allow anyone with read permissions to view this data?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I suppose that we don't want to share user details for template usage and latency with regular users.
The Roles table does not describe the use case when a regular user can be granted admin access for a single template using Template ACLs (enterprise feature). This is why I picked the for-loop with "update template" check to see if the user can modify a template, ergo can access insights.
Please let me know what is your recommendation in this case.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For the moment, this is OK as a bandage to stop the FE spinner issue. However, the current situation with regard to ACLs is not ideal in terms of integration with the rest of the RBAC package.