Skip to content

chore: Setup docs for Kubernetes on Google Cloud - to handle the cloud provider's required node image change from Docker to containerd #1037

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jul 10, 2022

Conversation

sharkymark
Copy link
Contributor

A prospect was blocked by the existing GKE install scripts which use Docker-based node images. e.g., ubuntu and cos.

The latest versions of Kubernetes require containerd-based node images, so the image-type must change to either ubuntu_containerd or cos_containerd

I also consolidated the machine-type overview, and changed to a more economical e2-standard-4 with nodes with links to general-purpose machine-type docs on Google Cloud.

Reference article (which I linked to in the docs) about the containerd change:
https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/node-images

@sharkymark sharkymark requested review from ericpaulsen and bpmct July 9, 2022 14:40
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jul 9, 2022

✨ Coder.com for PR #1037 deployed! It will be updated on every commit.

Copy link
Member

@ericpaulsen ericpaulsen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good. I believe this is a result of Dockershim deprecation in k8s 1.24 - https://kubernetes.io/blog/2022/02/17/dockershim-faq/

@ericpaulsen ericpaulsen merged commit fbc2953 into main Jul 10, 2022
@ericpaulsen ericpaulsen deleted the setup-kubernetes-google-node-image-support branch July 10, 2022 19:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants