Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Aug 18, 2025. It is now read-only.

Conversation

ericpaulsen
Copy link
Member

this PR includes context around what is Coder's hosted beta, and the initial steps needed to access a Coder hosted deployment. it stops short of stepping through the workspace provider configuration, as I expect this to be a separate guide. see clubhouse ticket.

[ch16426]

@ericpaulsen ericpaulsen added the docs 📝 Improvements or additions to documentation label Aug 30, 2021
@ericpaulsen ericpaulsen self-assigned this Aug 30, 2021
@shortcut-integration
Copy link

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Aug 30, 2021

✨ Coder.com for PR #571 deployed! It will be updated on every commit.

@bpmct
Copy link
Member

bpmct commented Aug 30, 2021

it stops short of stepping through the workspace provider configuration, as I expect this to be a separate guide.

I will be sending a PR for this today!

To help you get started, we've put together this guide to help you understand
how the Coder hosted beta works and how to access your deployment.

## What is Coder hosted beta?
Copy link
Member

@bpmct bpmct Aug 30, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@CoderErik created a lovely graphic demonstrating how this works. thoughts on adding a version of this in a later revision?

We also discussed modifying this graphic OR adding a second graphic to demonstrate that the clients actually have a point-to-point connection with workspaces. Thoughts on that as well?

@jmilling33 could probably work his magic on it

Shared Hosting.pdf

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

whoops here is the updated graphic

Shared Hosting (1).pdf

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Definitely think @CoderErik's graphic would fit well in here.

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@jmilling33 from a design standpoint, should we defer to you on that? @CoderErik's graphic is accurate, but I just want to make sure we keeps things consistent.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am happy to restyle the graphic to make sure it's consistent with our branding. When do you need it by?

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@jmilling33 Just shared the original file with you. Check email for the link.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@jmilling33 no hard deadline. It would be nice to update this doc in ~1 week or so via another PR.

For now, we can leave the illustration out

@khorne3
Copy link
Contributor

khorne3 commented Aug 31, 2021

@ericpaulsen the naming is wip -- it is hosted beta atm, so I updated the URL accordingly

@khorne3 khorne3 force-pushed the ericpaulsen/saas-getting-started branch from a8c5441 to 1546f7f Compare September 3, 2021 17:40
@khorne3
Copy link
Contributor

khorne3 commented Sep 3, 2021

@ericpaulsen I updated the final bit of instructions w/ the links; what else do you think needs to be done before shipping?

@shortcut-integration
Copy link

@ericpaulsen
Copy link
Member Author

@ericpaulsen I updated the final bit of instructions w/ the links; what else do you think needs to be done before shipping?

@khorne3 outside of linking to #576 at the bottom I think we're good. I see you force-pushed my branch to another commit. Will this prevent me from making another commit to my branch? thanks.

@khorne3
Copy link
Contributor

khorne3 commented Sep 3, 2021

@ericpaulsen I think it you pull the changes first, then edit, you should be good to go

@ericpaulsen
Copy link
Member Author

@ericpaulsen I think it you pull the changes first, then edit, you should be good to go

got it - all looks good to me! I'll click the big green button.

@ericpaulsen ericpaulsen marked this pull request as ready for review September 3, 2021 20:02
@ericpaulsen ericpaulsen requested review from khorne3 and bpmct September 3, 2021 20:02
@ericpaulsen ericpaulsen merged commit ecf9861 into main Sep 3, 2021
@ericpaulsen ericpaulsen deleted the ericpaulsen/saas-getting-started branch September 3, 2021 20:03
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
docs 📝 Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants