Skip to content

Add metadata block to the agent #112

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Mar 31, 2023
Merged

Add metadata block to the agent #112

merged 4 commits into from
Mar 31, 2023

Conversation

ammario
Copy link
Member

@ammario ammario commented Mar 15, 2023

No description provided.

@ammario ammario force-pushed the agent-metadata branch 2 times, most recently from 099761d to 2bcda81 Compare March 15, 2023 00:03
@ammario ammario requested a review from kylecarbs March 24, 2023 19:21
@ammario ammario marked this pull request as ready for review March 24, 2023 19:21
os = "linux"
arch = "amd64"
metadata {
key = "process_count"
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thoughts on calling this id instead? It's consistent with other naming we've done in here.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We can make it id... We don't really want people thinking they have to auto generate it though.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In resource_metadata, we use key.

@ammario ammario merged commit bfa0c5a into main Mar 31, 2023
@ammario ammario deleted the agent-metadata branch March 31, 2023 18:20
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 31, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants